TOPICS

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., was virtually shunned by other Democrats when he returned to the Senate Monday, fueling increased speculation that his days as chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and perhaps as a member of the Democratic Caucus, are numbered.

Democrats said on Tuesday that Lieberman will no longer attend Democratic Party lunches. "Sen. Lieberman has chosen not to attend Democratic Caucus lunches and that is his choice," said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

Lieberman's speech at the Republican National Convention last week, delivered to a national television audience in support of Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona, appears to have been the last straw for many Senate Democrats, as members and staff who previously avoided publicly criticizing the senator on Monday showed a new willingness to condemn his conduct.


RELATED STORIES

The criticism started at the top. Reid, who before the convention had gone to great lengths to portray Lieberman as solidly Democratic on most policies unrelated to the Iraq war, took the unusual step of lashing out at his colleague publicly through his press aides, who indicated Reid "was very disappointed" in the speech.

Rank-and-file Democrats followed Reid's example Monday afternoon. On their way to and from a vote, they expressed their disapproval.

"I urged him not to give it," said Sen. Thomas Carper, D-Del. "I know that a number of my colleagues did as well. There were parts of it that I found disappointing."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D- Calif., called the speech "hurtful," while Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., said, "To go ahead and bash our candidate, that went beyond where they needed to go."

Lieberman, who just eight years ago was the Democratic candidate for vice president, said Monday night he had not yet spoken to Democratic Senate colleagues, but noted, "I'm sure a lot of them are disappointed. But I am doing what I think is right and I am going to let the future take care of itself."

Any decision is likely not to come until after the election, in part because the Democratic majority in the Senate requires Lieberman to caucus with them. If he caucused with Republicans before the election, in which Democrats are expected to pick up seats, ties in the 50-50 Senate would be broken by Vice President Cheney, essentially putting Republicans in charge.

"I would say he's out, but there are a lot of things that have to be worked through," said an aide who works on committee issues. "It's not going to be an easy decision ... He's made it easier, but it's still hard."

While strong in his backing of McCain, Lieberman remains close to some Democrats and continues to contribute to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, giving close to $200,000 in the last two years through his campaign committee and PAC.

Whatever they might be plotting for January, Democrats will need his vote for the rest of this year. McCain will be hard-pressed to return for votes between now and the election, but so will Democratic nominee Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, and his running mate, Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware. Democrats can also subtract Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., from the equation, as he is still recovering from treatment for brain cancer and is not expected to return until January.

That leaves Democrats and Republicans with 48 senators each, short of the 60 votes Reid needs to pass almost anything. "The majority is just too slim," one Democratic aide lamented. But the same aide said those considerations will change in 2009.

"Lieberman speaking at the GOP convention was really a slap in the face to the Democratic Party and those colleagues that have supported him," the aide said. "It's difficult to come up with a scenario where he remains chairman next year."

Republicans, meanwhile, are stepping up efforts to convince Lieberman to switch parties. Though Lieberman has said he will keep caucusing with Democrats this year, some Republicans said they hope Lieberman will join Republicans before the election.

Should Lieberman no longer be chairman next year, whether through ouster by Democrats or appointment to a McCain administration, Carper is likely to take over as chairman, staffers who work on committee issues said. Carper declined to say whether he would pursue the post. "For now, my hope is that he will remain the committee chairman," he said of Lieberman.

Though Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, has seniority on the panel, Senate aides suggested he would likely choose and be encouraged by leaders to continue chairing the Veterans' Affairs Committee.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich, who also has more seniority than Carper, would presumably stay on as chairman of the Armed Services Committee, putting Carper, who has been active as chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Federal Financial Management Subcommittee, in line for the chairmanship.

A committee spokeswoman and spokesmen for Akaka and Carper declined to comment.

Lieberman's speech was the latest example of the senator distancing himself from his party. After losing Connecticut's Democratic Senate primary in 2006 but still winning re-election as an independent, Lieberman endorsed the re-election bid of Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, in April 2007. Late last year he endorsed McCain, and has campaigned on his behalf.

COMMENTS

  • "Just Saying" - I'm all for people standing on principles and standing behind their convictions. You're right. We need more politicians who will do that. However, the fact of the matter remains that the people of Connecticut dumped Joe Lieberman in the 2006 Democratic primary. Don't blame "The Democratic Party" (in the traditional sense). "The Democrats" didn't slap him in the face, stab him in the back, or betray him as I've seen it described in many comments here. Democratic voters in Connecticut were the ones who told him to beat it, but he couldn't handle that so he petitioned his way onto the November 2006 ballot as an independent candidate and made it back into the Senate. Yippee for him!!!! My guess is that he made it back into the Senate because many of those same Democratic voters stood behind him in the general election. My problem is with the way Joe Lieberman handled himself in 2006 and how he's being portrayed as the poor victim in 2008. He's no victim. He got exactly what he wanted. Now he needs to "man up" and live with the repercussions and the consequences of his actions. Just goes to show that you have to be careful about what you ask for because it often comes with unexpected "surprises". (And I'm still convinced that his appearance and speech at the Republican Convention were TACKY.)
  • "bee bee": "..didn't get his way..."? Are you kidding? Once again, we are talking about a senior incumbent Senator AND former Democratic Vice Presidential candidate, whose party dumped HIM in the primary in favor of a more liberal, anti-Bush Democrat! What did you expect him to do, forget that the Democrats slapped him in the face, and act like it never happened? He has the courage of his convictions, and doesn't change his beliefs every time the polls move this way or that. We need more Senators who put the good of their country before partisan politics. Good for him for sticking to his beliefs, and showing this country that not all Democrats have swung to the far left!
  • God forbid he exerts his free will! Neither party can stand someone who does that. They stabbed him in the back and are now are whining. Boo hoo.