TOPICS

The House approved a continuing resolution Wednesday to keep federal agencies operating at current levels until Nov. 16 on a 404-14 vote after Democrats voted to support a GOP-drafted amendment expressing support for Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq.

The motion by Appropriations ranking member Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., condemning "in the strongest possible terms" the recent ad by the anti-war group MoveOn.org, was approved on a 341-79 vote, after House Appropriations Chairman David Obey, D-Wis., endorsed the language and Democratic leaders released their members to support it.

Born into a Republican family "in the state of Joe McCarthy," Obey said one reason he switched parties was one of his teachers was impugned as a "Bolshevik" during the Red Scare. "To this day there's nothing that gets my dander up more than someone having their patriotism questioned," Obey said.


RELATED STORIES

Just as he opposed McCarthyite tactics from the right, "I've got an obligation to be equally upset when that kind of juvenile attack emanates from the left," Obey said.

Not all Democratic leaders were supportive. Watching Obey's speech from the House press gallery, Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., walked out in exasperation. "To me it's strictly a First Amendment issue," Slaughter said later. "If we can't stand up for the Constitution, who's going to?"

The Republican motion was designed to "make Democrats condemn one of their biggest campaign contributors," a GOP leadership aide said. A Democratic leadership aide dismissed the move as a "desperate attempt to keep the story alive."

A similar amendment passed the Senate, 72-25, during consideration of the fiscal 2008 defense authorization bill, and the House move could smooth Senate passage of the CR later this week.

The maneuvering came amid partisan rhetoric over the failure to approve the annual spending bills by the end of the fiscal year. The House passed all 12 bills, but the Senate has approved only four.

Bush and Democrats are at odds over $23 billion in spending, an amount Obey called "pretty small potatoes" compared with Bush's nearly $200 billion supplemental request for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Democratic sources say there might not be any action on the supplemental until early next year, since enough funding will be included in the fiscal 2008 Defense appropriations bill to pay for operations until then.

A spokesman for Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said no decision has been made on that yet.

Bush has already asked for $150.5 billion, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates went before the Senate Appropriations Committee Wednesday afternoon to outline a need for $42.3 billion more. That includes $11 billion for another 7,000 mine-resistant vehicles; $9 billion to replace worn-out equipment and technology; $6 billion for additional equipment and training; $1 billion for facilities and bases, and $1 billion to train and equip Iraqi security forces.

The State Department was also expected to request additional funds.

COMMENTS

  • It appears that we skipped over "United We Stand" and are working on "Divided We Fall". The far left has moved farther left and the far right still doesn't get it, so where is the middle ground. Ross Perot, never thought I would say this, but let's put this is a graph and point at it.
  • The vote to provide a continuing resolution is a phony democratic ploy. They keep on adding ammendments. Put the oringinal bill through as the Pres asked. Stop adding bridges to nowhere. Whatever happened to the line item veto? I am a WWII Vet and worked for the CG for 45 years and never have seen such phoney goings on. My position now is to petition everyone I know to sweep every one out of Congress this election. I am going to try to start a domain entitled "The Sweeper". Thats the only thing politicians know besides not giving anyone one penny. If they have money to spend on MoveOn.Org let them dig into that till. Signing off as disgusted with Washington!
  • This recent vote is all about the 1st Amendment and free speech. The ad was and is not about respect for our military leaders, or any of our soldiers, sailors and marines; it is about but the politics of this administration.