Procurement provision in hurricane aid bill raises eyebrows

By Amelia Gruber agruber@govexec.com September 9, 2005

The Office of Management and Budget is working to address concerns that a dramatic increase in the threshold for government credit card purchases, approved Thursday as part of Congress' $51.8 billion hurricane aid package, could spawn waste and abuse.

A provision in the emergency assistance bill (H.R. 3673) boosts the limit for emergency micropurchases from $15,000 to $250,000. Most micropurchases are made using government-issued credit cards and aren't subject to the competition requirements typically accompanying larger buys.

OMB's Office of Federal Procurement Policy, along with the General Services Administration, will issue guidance "shortly to address concerns that federal employees may misuse these flexibilities," said David Safavian, the OFPP administrator. The guidance may require senior contracting officers to sign off on any purchases of more than $50,000, according to a spokesman for Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine.

Such a requirement would satisfy Collins, chairwoman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, the spokesman said. Collins, ranking member Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Finance Committee, on Thursday sent a letter to colleagues seeking a "more reasonable limit, perhaps $50,000."

The $250,000 threshold leaves room for "abuse and misuse," the senators said. "The depth of the tragedy here seems overwhelming," they wrote. "At the same time, however, we should not allow the immediate needs of this disaster to trump the need for oversight and accountability for the spending that will occur on these purchase cards."

The provision, included in the White House's request for the supplemental funds, also encountered criticism in the House.

"The vast majority of federal employees are honest, upstanding people, but ability to buy up to $250,000 in any single purchase is a great temptation," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., in a Sept. 8 letter to House Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis, R-Calif. "In addition, most federal employees are not trained to make purchases of this magnitude to ensure that taxpayers get the best value for their money."

Safavian said he is working with Grassley and "others on the Hill" to ensure that the flexibilities are used properly. But he defended the increase, arguing that the move was necessary to "cut red tape and streamline deliveries."

"Given the scope of the disaster and the significant efforts by federal officials, we want to make sure that critical services and supplies can be acquired and delivered in the most expeditious manner possible," Safavian said. OFPP is encouraging agency acquisition chiefs to "fully utilize" emergency flexibilities in the Federal Acquisition Regulation, he added.

Lawmakers would have been wise to place a time limit on the authorities granted in the hurricane assistance bill, said Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, a Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group. Without a limit, use of the $250,000 threshold could extend beyond the time necessary to meet immediate assistance needs, she said.

An effort also should be made to ensure that micropurchases made under the threshold are transparent and later are subject to inspector general reviews, Brian said. She argued that the provision in the supplemental bill was well-meaning but unnecessary because the FAR already contains language granting flexibility to enter into noncompetitive contracts in emergency situations.

But Safavian said that legislative action was necessary to raise the threshold. He also noted that the aid package includes $15 million for the Homeland Security Department's inspector general to oversee spending related to Hurricane Katrina.

VIEW ALL COMMENTS POST COMMENT

COMMENTS

  • We haven't BEGUN to see the looting response to Katrina yet. Just wait until the pols get their collective hands on this "aid!" And folks? I doesn't matter which party the pol says they belong to - they all are self-serving when it comes to our tax dollars. Submariner Posted September 20, 2005 7:31 AM
  • It must be nice to play with the taxpayers' dollars like this. This will prove to be loaded with corruption before it is over with. The government already knows how some people in government have abused credit cards assigned to them - everything from prostitutes to fancy jewelry have been purchased and so far I have seen little taken against those who abuse these cards. If this happens again, in the face of this disaster, let's see a little prison time for those who abuse the system. I don't mean the ENRON type either. Americans are getting fed up with this type of crap and it needs to end. If Congress can't end it, lets end their careers and elect those who will faithfully serve the american people and their interests. Charlie Posted September 10, 2005 12:47 PM
  • A typical solution by a government that is 'reactive' instead of 'proactive' when there has been documented proof of credit card abuse! Business as usual....at the taxpayer'$ expen$e!! A-76'd Career Federal Employee Posted September 10, 2005 9:04 AM
VIEW ALL COMMENTS

GovExec Live!
With critics -- including the president -- describing the response to Hurricane Katrina as dismal, Congress and the Bush administration are gearing up to investigate what happened, what didn't happen and what should have happened down on the Gulf Coast.

From 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. EST on Wed., Sept. 14, GovExec.com reporter Karen Rutzick and Justin Rood, staff correspondent for Government Executive magazine, will take your questions and comments regarding the operation, as well as what federal employees are doing to help hurricane victims. You can submit your questions early or during the live online discussion.