TOPICS
TOPICS
Congress to act quickly on Bush's $51.8 billion aid request
Hurricane Katrina continued to dominate the congressional agenda Wednesday as the White House sent up a $51.8 billion supplemental aid request, while House and Senate GOP leaders acknowledged the budget reconciliation process of non-Katrina items will be delayed as a result of more pressing matters.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said Congress would clear the hurricane aid this week, which would be enough to last the Federal Emergency Management Agency -- which is burning through money at the rate of nearly $2 billion per day -- until the end of this month. The package is to last for five weeks and includes $50 billion for FEMA, $1.4 billion for the Pentagon and $400 million for the Army Corps of Engineers.
At a press briefing late Wednesday afternoon, Office of Management and Budget Director Joshua Bolten said he expects about half of FEMA's allocation to be used for direct payments to Hurricane Katrina victims, to assist them with housing and other immediate needs. The remainder of FEMA's allotment will likely go toward ground logistics, including the removal of debris.
The Pentagon's funds are aimed mainly at repairing Defense facilities damaged by the hurricane, Bolten said.
But one of the supplemental package's strengths is that the funding would be flexible, Bolten said. He also offered assurances that the money is targeted directly to areas affected by the hurricane and said there are mechanisms in place to prevent it from getting diverted to other causes.
The supplemental is the second relief package proposed by the Bush administration and will not be the last, Bolten said. He declined to speculate on the total amount that will be needed.
White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said the request would focus on immediate needs, with more funding to be sought at a later date for longer-term disaster relief projects. The House is expected to take up the measure Thursday, and Frist said the Senate would follow suit before the end of the week. Senate Appropriations Chairman Thad Cochran, R-Miss., acknowledged that Congress and the White House misjudged when passing a $10.5 billion stopgap last week. "It appears we're going to have to act before two weeks are up," he said.
Estimates of the total cost of Katrina relief and reconstruction keep rising -- to more than $200 billion by some estimates. Immediate deficit concerns appear to be falling by the wayside, though Bolten said he does not expect the relief effort to change the medium- to long-term outlook for deficit reduction efforts.
GOP leaders served notice that the budget reconciliation process and other outstanding issues will remain on track, if delayed by at least two weeks. "This Congress is capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time," Hastert said, mentioning the fiscal 2006 appropriations process, immigration and tax cuts as well as reconciliation as items remaining high on the agenda. House Budget Chairman Jim Nussle, R-Iowa, said he agreed to delay most non-Katrina related legislation, "but we should not be distracted by this or anything else to continue to our efforts to reform government."
Senate Budget Chairman Judd Gregg. R-N.H., said that while no formal agreement has been reached, he and Frist have discussed delaying the reconciliation process.
"We all know we're going to have to put this off because of the present intensity of the Katrina issues, but whether it's two weeks, three weeks, I don't know. But the view is we're going to still execute this reconciliation package in a timely manner," Gregg said.
Frist chief of staff Eric Ueland said the majority leader is weighing his options and should announce his decision within the next 48 hours. Meanwhile, House Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., said he envisions three separate bills moving, one per week over the next three weeks, beginning with a vote Thursday on freeing up funds under programs such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and also encouraging charitable donations.
"We're not putting a lot of new money out there; it's freeing up money that's there already," Thomas said. That would then be followed by funds for infrastructure repairs and then bills aimed at longer-term recovery.
COMMENTS
- Shrub keeps talking about "staying the course" although he's never defined what that means. He keeps talking about staying in Iraq until "we win" although he's never defined what it means to win. Why would anyone believe that a man who has failed at everything he's attempted (baseball team owner, businessman, soldier, president) could possibly resolve thousands of years of cultural and religious differences between the factions in Iraq in a few short years? Why should we encourage our sons and daughters to fight in a war started by men who refused to fight in a war? How many more lives and how much more money are you willing to sacrifice, America, how many more people have to fall into poverty, how much more are we willing to pay for gas while the oil industry (which includes Bush and Cheney) loots the wallets of the taxpayers? How many people have to die needlessly in an another natural disaster before we wake up? George W. Bush - Never in Doubt, Almost Always Wrong. GovExec.com reader Posted September 9, 2005 8:19 PM
- All this reminds me of is when Clinton was president we had three years of surplus (that means money over our expenses) and within a short period of time Mr. Bush gave the richest among us a trillion dollar tax cut and now we have to borrow money to pay the bills we are now looking at. So, don't tell me the republicans are for the poorest among us, they have proven to me, they like the rich and don't much care about the poor. Deficits do count and poor people can't do anything about it. National debt counts and poor people can't do anything about it. At the current rate the National debt will equal the GDP in short order. What do we do then? What happens when the Communist Chinese call in their loans and demand full payment? We will be broke and unable to pay our debt. How are we going to blame Clinton for that? rds Posted September 8, 2005 12:46 PM
- We should certainly do this. BUT.....this is ONE reason we need to keep some focus on our "OWN", before getting so involved in Iraq. How much can this country afford? This affects all of us. With the new pay system, the gas prices, the already poor getting poorer, the middle class becoming poorer, the seniors and Veterans in proverty who have given so much, the many issues we have facing us in America, how can we afford to do what we are doing in Iraq? Sadly, now that what has been done, we are obligated to get to a certain point over there. Just look at the cost. Not only in money, but lives, family suffering and suffering in our own land. Our own who is in the position to make the decisions, apparently don't think they ever need to prepare for a "rainy day". They already "have" and THINK they too are always covered. They speak and represent this country and its people. We need to get these people to wake up. GovExec.com reader Posted September 7, 2005 10:22 PM
GovExec Live!
With critics -- including the president -- describing the response to Hurricane Katrina as dismal, Congress and the Bush administration are gearing up to investigate what happened, what didn't happen and what should have happened down on the Gulf Coast.
From 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. EST on Wed., Sept. 14, GovExec.com reporter Karen Rutzick and Justin Rood, staff correspondent for Government Executive magazine, will take your questions and comments regarding the operation, as well as what federal employees are doing to help hurricane victims. You can submit your questions early or during the live online discussion.









