TOPICS

More mid-career government jobs going to private sector workers

The government filled a greater percentage of mid-career jobs with private sector applicants in 2003, but the number of job notices advertised to all comers declined, according to a new survey by the Partnership for Public Service.

The Partnership, a Washington nonprofit group working to encourage more Americans to consider federal employment, found that government agencies filled 15.3 percent of positions from GS-12 to GS-15 with outside hires. The total has risen each year since the organization first conducted its mid-career hiring survey in 2000, when only 10.5 percent of the GS-12 to GS-15 positions were filled from the outside.

During the same time period, though, the number of jobs opened to outside applicants declined from 49 percent to 43 percent.


RELATED STORIES

Partnership President Max Stier said the survey shows that the federal government "has not invested in mid-career hiring very significantly." Government service has traditionally been viewed as a lifelong career, he added, and as a result most government hiring has been at the entry level. But workforce preferences are changing, and now Americans "increasingly view jobs as not a place to spend an entire lifetime, but [a place] to spend a shorter period to build your career."

Government will have to look more to the private sector to fill its employment needs, Stier said, because the federal downsizing during the 1990s left a gap in the pipeline of qualified managers and technicians. Agencies are going to have to go outside to find qualified leaders. "The talent needs of the government are enormous," he said. "The only way to get the very best talent is to seek talent in all the places it exists."

While the survey data indicates that government agencies are skeptical of private sector applicants, mid-career professionals are skeptical of the government, according to Partnership research. A survey of mid-career professionals earlier this year found that many are leery about coming to work in what they view as an overly bureaucratic environment.

Because of hiring rules, agencies can't recruit specific workers, as private sector companies might, a factor that makes luring top talent all the more difficult. But Stier argues that the federal government can overcome these difficulties. Agencies will have to learn to recruit beyond colleges and universities, looking to professional associations and advertising in professional journals. The best managers are already scouting out top private sector applicants, said Stier.

"It's not inconsistent with open and fair competition to try to persuade the best people to apply," he said, even as the applicants still have to go through the competitive process.

Still, many government agencies seem to open jobs to the public in a perfunctory manner. The partnership data, which was culled from the Office of Personnel Management's Central Personnel Data File, found that the Small Business Administration, for one, opened 97 percent of mid-career openings to outside applicants in 2003, but only 4 percent of the jobs were filled by outside applicants.

SBA had the worst record of any agency in the survey, followed by the Treasury Department (6 percent), Social Security Administration (8 percent), and Justice Department (8 percent). The Health and Human Services Department, by contrast, filled 25 percent of its mid-career openings with outside hires, followed by the State Department (23 percent), and the Army (22 percent).

COMMENTS

  • I am a middle manager (GS14) in the Govt. What I'm finding to be at fault is the recruiting process overall. We need to rethink the idea that because a person graduates wtih a GPA of 3.4 or higher, that person is a good candidate to come into the Govt (regardless of the level). Many with high GPAs are good at passing exams, but are not necessarily quality applicants for doing the actual work. I know many graduates who struggle to get their degrees, their GPAs are below the 3.4 criteria but are the best workers you would want on your staff. They are more dedicated, want to work, etc. Federal Govt is losing too many GOOD recruits by sticking to the criteria they put in their job announcements (which applies even to being entry level). Why does a GS-5 have to have a high GPA, or a Masters Degree or higher to be a automation clerk? I think it's time we start helping people get their foot in the door versus cutting their career off before they can even begin one. The second piece preventing good recruits is our security criteria. If there is someone on the outside who has 30 years of experience, holds an active TOP Secret clearance and applies to an agency with the requirement they must have a clearance, then why does that agency start from scratch initiating an interim clearance before bringing the person on board. It takes a long time to request and get an interim; overloads the backload that the Security Agency already has; waste our funds redoing a process that has been done and paid for; and makes the applicant accept a job they may not necessarily be interested in but takes anyway because that person needs a job!!!!! PERIOD!!!! Both parties lose in this case.
  • Why don't they look instead at the talent they have trapped in low-graded, dead-end positions? Incidentally, tax payer, you who accuse the unions of "whining" - are you now "whining" too? Or do you begin to see what the unions are talking about?
  • I think the government sometimes limits itself in hiring. Check the Job Announcemnt Boards: many job announcements for the higher-paying jobs in the DC area (especially those nice and juicy GS-13/14/15 non-competitive advancement ones) also specify that no moving costs will be paid. There are many capable employees in the hinterlands who are all but excluded from the candidate pool.