Union to appeal court ruling on screener bargaining rights
The American Federation of Government Employees is appealing a recent decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to dismiss a lawsuit the union filed against the Transportation Security Administration demanding collective bargaining rights for airport screeners.
For the past nine months, union officials have fought to overturn a decision by TSA Administrator James Loy, who said he would not bargain with screener unions, because it was "not compatible with the flexibility required to wage the war against terrorism." AFGE contends that Loy's directive violates the Constitution and the 2001 Aviation and Transportation Security Act.
In July, a regional Federal Labor Relations Authority judge upheld Loy's decision. AFGE officials then took their fight to federal district court. On Sept. 5, a district court judge dismissed the case, instructing AFGE to exhaust its FLRA appeal options. Now, union officials are appealing that ruling to the federal Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
AFGE president John Gage said TSA employees need union protection. "As a result of TSA's 'make-it-up-as-you-go-along' personnel system, screeners are being unfairly disciplined and even fired for their efforts to protect the public," he said. "Without management accountability, many screeners are being forced to ignore, or make exceptions to, potentially dangerous situations for fear of losing their jobs."
Darrin Kayser, a TSA spokesman, said agency officials could not discuss pending litigation.
RELATED STORIES
- Judge sends TSA bargaining rights case back to labor board 09/05/03
- Airport screeners don't have bargaining rights, labor board rules 07/08/03
- Union sues TSA over screener's unionization discussions 06/12/03
- TSA screeners press for union representation 06/09/03
- Union strengthens bid to recruit airport screeners 02/27/03










Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.