TOPICS
TOPICS
Politics of Pay
The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Treasury and General Government approved legislation Wednesday that includes language supporting military-civilian pay parity and granting civil service employees a 4.1 percent pay raise in 2004. The House Appropriations Committee approved similar legislation in July.
"It continues to amaze me that so many political leaders fail to make the connection between competitive public and private sector pay and the government's ability to attract and retain the high-quality employees agencies need and want," National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley said Wednesday. "I'm pleased and encouraged that the members of this key Senate subcommittee understand that."
Last week the Bush administration announced it would hold firm to its 2004 pay raise proposal of 2 percent for white-collar workers, citing national security needs and federal budget constraints.
Salary increases for employees under the General Schedule are calculated using a formula set out in the 1990 Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act, but no president has ever fully implemented the law and Congress has generally had to step in and grant federal employees a larger pay raise. Under FEPCA, federal employees would receive a 2.7 percent across-the-board pay raise in 2004, still lower than the 4.1 percent pay raise promised in the two appropriations bills working their way through Congress.
In the days following the announcement, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle threw down the gauntlet, pledging to fight tooth and nail for the larger pay raise.
"His [the president's] decision to invoke a national emergency to provide an inadequate pay raise for the very men and women who are confronting that emergency on a daily basis smacks of indifference, or at least a failure to understand the role federal employees play in keeping America safe," said House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md. "But I urge the president to remember that the workers he is shortchanging are the scientists at the CDC who are working to protect Americans against a biological terrorist attack, the men and women of the CIA who are risking their lives around the world in the fight against terrorism, and the Customs officers who guard our borders. These are not faceless clerks pushing paper in the bowels of government bureaucracy."
Hoyer joined with Reps. James Moran, D-Va., and Frank Wolf, R-Va., to introduce the House version of the pay parity measure.
"Federal civilian employees work side by side with military personnel fighting the war on terrorism," Moran said. "As a matter of fairness, they should receive the same compensation and not be used to score ideological points."
A spokesman for House Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va., said the lawmaker was committed to military-civilian pay parity and would fight for the larger raise.
The House bill is headed to the floor next and the Senate bill will go to the full committee.
COMMENTS
- It's all a game! Bush says 2%, Congress says 4%, Bush says 2%, Congress passes 4%, Bush says he'll VETO, but he'll sign. How stupid would the Republican-lead Congress and administration look if a veto were to happen? For someone that said he was a uniter, Bush has done nothing but driven a BIG wedge between the haves and have nots, between the Democrats and Republicans. Anyone who would vote for Bush the next time around needs to have their lobotomy redone. GovExec.com reader Posted September 10, 2003 8:08 AM
- The Bush administration has shown us time and again how little they respect civil service employees. I believe there are about 1.75 million of us. We should make sure the administration understands that all 1.75 million are voters and can have a decisive impact on the outcome of the next election. GovExec.com reader Posted September 8, 2003 12:19 PM
- I still don't understand why the President feels so negative about pay parity for the federal employees. We civilians also go with the soldiers to danger/war zones and have to adapt to the same conditions as the military. And we don't even get the same benefits!! While the military don't pay federal taxes when deployed overseas, we, the federal employees do. We don't get any special benefits, no per diem, stay at the barracks/same accommodations as the military, do not receive any other benefits as the military, the only additional pay we receive is $150 per month for being in a danger zone (which we have to claim once we return and fill out the TDY papers, it is not automatic like the military and takes forever to be paid once the papers are submitted), and we have to be there when required. So, it would be more than fair that we receive the same percentage increase as the military. GovExec.com reader Posted September 6, 2003 9:42 PM










