GovernmentExecutive.com

In the early 1960s, engineers in nuclear weapons testing programs in the United States and the Soviet Union noticed an unexpected phenomenon when warheads were exploded high above the Earth's surface. The electromagnetic fields produced by the detonations often resulted in damage to electrical systems on the ground. One test 400 kilometers above Johnston Island in the South Pacific destroyed a commercial telecommunications system in the Hawaiian Islands 1,400 kilometers away.

Now, a new report by the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack warns that a nuclear attack aimed at crippling the nation's technological backbone could be greater today than it was during the Cold War. Such an attack also would be easier to orchestrate, and potentially more devastating, than a direct hit to a major metropolitan area.

"The electromagnetic pulse generated by a high-altitude nuclear explosion is one of a small number of threats that can hold our society at risk of catastrophic consequences," the commission found.

To thoroughly understand the threat, the commission sponsored analytic tests to examine the specific vulnerabilities of critical infrastructure, including: electric power systems; telecommunications; banking and finance; petroleum and natural gas pipelines; transportation systems; food and water infrastructure; emergency services, space systems; government operations; and communications for keeping the citizenry informed. As a result, the 208-page report details the daunting complexity of modern life.

"The separation of these infrastructures into different domains tends to obscure the real interdependencies that sustain the effectiveness and daily operation of each one," the report found. To illustrate the point, the commission noted that the accidental severing of a single fiber-optic cable in New York City in 1991 resulted in a power failure that blocked 60 percent of phone calls into and out of the city, disabled air traffic control functions in the Washington-Boston flight corridor (the busiest in the nation) and crippled the operations of the New York Mercantile Exchange.

"The increasingly pervasive use of electronics of all forms represents the greatest source of vulnerability to attack by EMP. Electronics are used to control, communicate, compute, store, manage and implement nearly every aspect of U.S. civilian systems," the commission reported.

"Should significant parts of the electric power infrastructure be lost for any substantial period of time, the commission believes that the consequences are likely to be catastrophic, and many people may ultimately die for lack of the basic elements necessary to sustain life in dense urban and suburban communities," the report noted. Such is possible, the commission said, because some critical electrical system components are no longer manufactured in the United States, and acquiring them in routine circumstances can take a year.

In July, the House Armed Services Committee received a preview of the report's findings in testimony by William R. Graham, chairman of the commission. "Our vulnerability is increasing daily as our use of and dependence on electronics continues to grow in both our civil and military sectors," Graham said.

"What is significant about an EMP attack is that one or a few high-altitude nuclear detonations can produce EMP effects that can potentially disrupt or damage electronic systems over much of the United States, virtually simultaneously, at a time determined by an adversary," Failure to address the vulnerability could both invite and reward an attack.

Graham noted that an adversary wouldn't have to have long-range ballistic missile capability to deliver an EMP attack. Such an attack could be launched from a freighter off the coast of the United States, using a short- or medium-range missile loaded with a nuclear warhead.

"Iran, the world's leading sponsor of international terrorism, has practiced launching a mobile ballistic missile from a vessel in the Caspian Sea," Graham said. "Iranian military writings explicitly discuss an EMP attack that would gravely harm the United States. While the commission does not know the intention of Iran in conducting these activities, we are disturbed by the capability that emerges when we connect the dots."

The commission found that large-scale, long-term consequences of an EMP attack could be reduced below the level of catastrophe through a coordinated effort by the government and private sector. In November, the commission will report on the progress of protecting the nation from an EMP attack.

COMMENTS

• The referenced report addresses the concept of widespread use of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Systems (SCADA). this is troubling to me. While most of my collegues do not agree with me, the SCADA design and use in the electricity grid in the U.S. is intended to collect data for revenue purposes. The NERC report on the 2003 Outage noted that electricity control is limited to simple generator and generating plant adjustments. SCADA control of electricity is, largely, not based on the physics of the grid. The proof of my perspective is the lack of control by operations staff of a phenomenon called "Loop Flow Effect". andrew loebl Posted August 29, 2008 1:22 PM
• Seems like a diversion from the other EMP scenario, low power nuclear detonation. WTC Tower 7 left a fleet of fried and radioactive vehicles, temporary radio outages, and a pool of molten steel that burned for two weeks. Check the photos of the NY fleets sitting in the dump, bodies like new, but engines and electronics destroyed. Sitting across the river were five guys with a white van filming the whole thing and cheering. Anthony Weishar Posted August 27, 2008 6:49 AM
• Woah, the EMP is back. Looks like some contractors are demanding their scheduled money injection. So, are we game to spend another mountain of dollars to re-invent "new-old" style electronics and the machinery that uses those for selected domains? I would think the billions on billions spent on Y2K assurance will look like chump change in comparison. Not that it's going to be of much help in case of an attack because the US economy with all cviie electronics dead in the event of a strike will go down the drain anyway - even if the US generals can stay in touch. Call now but starve later. To top it off, the tedious scarecrow of "Iran" is unpacked, as if Iran would suddenly manage to finally assemble some kind of nuke, put it on a missile and attack the States from a freighter off-coast (clue-in: Iran does not even have the Uranium to build a gun-type nuke and Persians do not give any indication of being particulary suicidal either) I remember the exact same "offshore freighter" argument being made about a possible attack with a cobalt bomb by evil Soviets about 25 years ago. The more things change, the more they stay the same. Hey, we can be killed! Deal with it. American parts, Russian parts, all made in Taiwan. Posted August 24, 2008 11:46 PM