TOPICS
TOPICS
IG criticizes Army, Air Force officers' participation in religious video
A recent report by the Defense Department's inspector general concluded that seven Army and Air Force officers -- including four generals -- improperly participated in a 2004 video promoting Christian Embassy, an evangelical group that has reached out to political, military and diplomatic leaders in Washington for more than 30 years.
In addition to those seven officers, the Aug. 3 report noted the participation of Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Stephen Johnson and Retired Vice Adm. Dan Cooper, undersecretary for benefits in the Veterans Affairs Department, in the video, but did not assess whether either of them violated ethics rules with the appearance.
Army spokesman Paul Boyce said the service is reviewing the report's findings and recommendations. "We'll work with the chain of command and of course the officers who are mentioned in the report," he said
Lt. Col. Linda Haseloff, an Air Force spokeswoman, told the Associated Press on Monday that the service is undergoing a similar review.
The officers whose actions were criticized by the report were Army brigadier generals Vincent Brooks and Robert Caslen, retired Army Chaplain Col. Ralph Benson, and Air Force major generals Peter Sutton and John Catton, along with an Army lieutenant colonel and an Air Force colonel whose names were redacted.
They "were filmed during the duty day, in uniform with rank clearly displayed, in official and often identifiable Pentagon locations....The remarks of some officers implied they spoke for a group of senior military leaders rather than just for themselves. None of the officers sought or received approval to participate in the interview in an official capacity or in uniform," the report concluded.
Those actions violated Defense Department prohibitions on providing or appearing to provide government endorsement of non-official activities. The IG exonerated two other officials who appeared in the video but without a title, uniform or Defense Department insignia that would imply the department's endorsement.
A number of the officers told the IG that they had not asked for permission to participate in the video because they assumed it had been sanctioned when former Chaplain Benson requested permission for the Christian Embassy film crew to work in the Pentagon.
But the report found that Benson's request described a project very different from the final product.
The public affairs office granted permission for an escorted crew to film for nine hours on Feb. 4, 2004. But the report concluded that the crew was not escorted, and that it returned to the Pentagon on numerous occasions over the next 10 months.
The final product made no mention of the independent work of the Pentagon chaplain's office. Instead, the military officers, members of Congress, administration officials, diplomatic representatives and diplomats' wives who appeared in the video offered a multi-faceted endorsement of Christian Embassy's work.
The report concluded that the Christian Embassy film crew's level of access to Pentagon facilities and employees constituted a "selective benefit" that was not made available to other religious organizations.
The report also found that the chaplain's office authorized contractor badges for 34 religious volunteers. Nineteen of the badges went to Christian clergy, including employees of Christian Embassy; nine to volunteers with Christian organizations, including Christian Embassy's parent organization, Campus Crusade for Christ; five to unaffiliated volunteers; and one to a rabbi.
The badges allowed unrestricted access to the Pentagon at any time, and permitted the holder to escort a group of up to 10 people. The report found that contractor badges are normally restricted to individuals who are performing some kind of paid work for the Defense Department.
Though Benson told investigators that he only intended the video to be seen by Christians, it has already had a broader reach -- and broader repercussions.
According to the IG's report, "Maj. Gen. Sutton testified that while in Turkey in his current duty position, his Turkish driver approached him with an article in the Turkish newspaper 'Sabah.' That article featured a photograph of Maj. Gen. Sutton in uniform and described him as a member of a radical fundamentalist sect. The article in the online edition of Sabah also included still photographs taken from the Christian Embassy video."
Sutton's job in Ankara "included establishing good relations with his counterparts on the Turkish General Staff," the report continued. "He testified that when the article was published...it caused his Turkish counterparts concern and a number of Turkish general officers asked him to explain his participation in the video."
COMMENTS
- I am one of those in the CE video tape although I have since retired from the military (unrelated to the IG report) yet still serve the same God. None of us in the tape EVER knowingly used our faith to make our colleagues, supervisors, or subordinates uncomfortable and please don't tell me it's perception. Every human has a value set which guides our actions & thoughts--mine is based on my faith in Christ as Messiah & Lord. I know most of the CE staff and every person in uniform in that video -- all are tremendous leaders and incredibly professional. All have served honorably--most have been deployed from families a good portion of their adult lives. Chaplain Benson was always humble and careful in guiding his actions to support Pentagon individuals--with God and country in mind. The IG report's findings are a knee jerk response and the conclusions were probably foreknown. The Christian Embassy isn't in the mission field to earn money; it facilitates those serving the Lord in professional, leadership capaciities. I never felt or currently feel deceived by the CE folks and would gladly do my part again to support their mission--serving God. Who out there thinks Christians bring negative morality to the workforce, neighborhood, or academia? And that "wall of separation" is against establishment of a church by the state (federal or state level)--not involvement by individuals. All of us should reread the IG report and the Constitution--and hopefully the Bible. God bless America and I pray we never lose our Founding Fathers' dream of one nation under God. Bob Ashton Posted September 6, 2007 3:28 PM
- TO: PJ Of course no religious studies (not just Christian Bible studies) should take place as official duty in a Government office. I note you specifically referred to Christian Bible study, although all faiths have holy writings of some type. This is illustrative of the distinctly anti-Christian bias that permeates many of these comments. How is sharing one's faith an act lacking compassion, and in what way is this someting to fear in military leaders? Merely expressing belief is not the same as "pushing it off on others." In this free nation, all types of images promoting values I do not share are constantly put in my face. I must ignore them. You should do the same with unwanted proseltylizing. But when folks just make it known what they stand for religious-wise, Christian or otherwise, you should get over it. Until you are made to join a Federal church, which has not been created to my knowledge, no one is violating any constitution provision. Contracting Officer Posted August 29, 2007 3:18 PM
- If a work place supervisor or employer conducts Christian bible study during work and as part of work, it certainly is a real concern to employees who do not participate, no matter how benignly it may be meant. That military leaders who can ruin careers and send men and women to mortal combat use their work time, uniforms, and positions to promote their faith should be something for everyone to fear. It is even more shameful that people insist otherwise non-religious organizations promote their faith without compassion for those who do not share their faith. A truly free and spiritual nation is filled with people who have faith, not people who push their faith on others. PJ Posted August 24, 2007 5:01 PM









