TOPICS
TOPICS
TSA revamping shoe-screening policy
The Transportation Security Administration wants to try clearing passengers through airport security without removing their shoes.
TSA, the employer of federal airport security screeners, posted a notice Friday for a program this winter to test devices to inspect shoes.
"[TSA] invites voluntary participation to a qualification test program leading to a list of qualified sources for shoe weapon inspection [technology] that can inspect footwear for weapons without passengers having to remove or divest them from their feet," read the notice on the Federal Business Opportunities Web site.
Several lawmakers have criticized TSA for requiring passengers -- particularly frail, elderly passengers and U.S. soldiers -- to take off their footwear before going through metal detectors. TSA began inspecting passengers' shoes after terrorist Richard Reid, also known as the "Shoe Bomber," attempted in 2001 to blow up an airplane by lighting a bomb concealed in his shoe.
TSA said it would not guarantee the test project would lead to a contract, and companies must pay the costs related to testing their devices. Companies must submit a "White Paper" on their product by Aug. 22. TSA said it would choose devices three weeks after the deadline, and then companies would have four weeks to deliver their systems to the agency for in-house testing. Ninety days later, TSA plans to pick devices for the test program. The agency did not say where it would test the devices and did not return phone calls.
In 2003, the Homeland Security Department clarified its shoe-screening policy, saying screeners are instructed to encourage travelers to remove their shoes before entering the X-ray machines, but passengers are not required to do so.
TSA has found the checkpoint lines move faster if people remove their shoes because metal in shoes often triggers the alarm. The flow of passengers through airports has been a point of contention with lawmakers, and Congress has repeatedly pressed TSA to develop more efficient technology to speed up passenger and baggage screening.
Late last year, Congress required the Homeland Security Department to deliver a strategic report on its plan to deploy advanced explosive detection equipment at airports, including walkthrough explosive detection portals, document scanners, shoe scanners and backscatter X-ray scanners. The report, which was due in March, has not been delivered.
COMMENTS
- The removal of shoes is a joke! I had to remove shoes at Dulles airport but not in Memphis, San Diego, St Louis, or Las Vegas. It appears to me that shoe search is a political thing only done where government people will most likely see it. The entire shoe search idea is crazy and should be dropped totally. The government should not waste my money developing machines to "read shoes". waiting for reason Posted August 16, 2005 7:01 AM
- I live in a medium-sized midwest city with a small regional airport that employs more than 60 TSA employees at that airport. The ICE office has less than 10 for 1/3 of the state. Here's a thought! Abolish TSA and give it back to Wackenhut and move those positions to where they can accomplish something................................ ICEman GovExec.com reader Posted August 16, 2005 11:22 AM
- Admittedly the shoe business (sorry for the pun...)was ridiculous but racial profiling has not worked particularly well in the long term. Our opponent actually obtains insight into our tactics if we dump the same kind of people all the time and he will adjust accordingly. It may take a little while but they will catch us with our drawers down while we are busy with our by then unrealistic profiles. That does not, however, mean you can't target on other meaningful characterstics, employ rovers, and take other measures to make sure your stuff is up to date. Our targeting across the government is often, in my opinion, kneejerk, predictable, and a means to show we are "doing something". We need to make it clear to potential attackers that we are on the ball. That requires committment and time on the part of dedicated civil servants who know the ropes, not 20 something lawyers, CNN/FOX talking heads, interns, and other self-styled terrorism and security experts. We have the goods right here and just piddle it away..... Stamp Monkey Posted August 10, 2005 5:49 PM
GovExec Live!
Earlier this year, Defense personnel officials proposed replacing the General Schedule system, implementing a performance pay framework, streamlining the employee appeals process and scaling back collective bargaining. The new system would affect more than 700,000 employees. On June 7 Pentagon officials announced they would delay implementation of the National Security Personnel System and union officials say they plan to take legal action to block the new system as soon as the final regulations are sent to Congress.
At noon on Wed., Aug. 10, Don Hale, president of the American Federation of Government Employees' Defense Conference, also known as DEFCON, and a civilian defense worker at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, will respond to your questions and comments about the changes at the Defense Department, as well as the Bush administration's governmentwide personnel reform proposal. Submit your questions early or during the chat.
