Labor-HHS spending bill likely to wait until at least September
House Republican leaders are likely to postpone action on the $141.9 billion fiscal 2007 Labor-Health and Human Services spending bill until September at the earliest, aides said Monday, even if House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, brings up a separate minimum wage bill next week.
Discussions are intensifying on the wage front, with party moderates seeking a vote before the break. While no decisions have been made on the minimum wage, there is little time and less interest in a divisive Labor-HHS debate before the recess, said GOP aides.
The underlying bill's primary obstacle has been Democrats' attachment of a $2.10-per-hour minimum wage increase. The measure also faces criticism from both wings of the GOP -- conservatives don't like the numerous earmarks; moderates argue it underfunds education and health programs.
Despite having more money to spread around, Senate Republicans are facing the same problems with their own Labor-HHS bill. The matter is likely to be discussed in a lame-duck session, if not kicked into next year as part of a continuing resolution.
The Senate Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee will consider a $142.8 billion version Tuesday, which at $870 million above the House is not enough to satisfy Senate moderates, including Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa.
Representing a $5 billion increase over the White House request, the bill is nearly $2.2 billion shy of what Specter and others argue is necessary to keep pace with inflation. The inclusion of roughly $650 million in student aid costs for the first time -- a quirk of the deficit reduction law enacted earlier this year -- cuts into funds that would have otherwise been available for traditional Labor-HHS priorities.
Specter was able to fund the National Institutes of Health at $28.5 billion, about $250 million above the House bill and administration request and $150 million above fiscal 2006. That is barely above a freeze, and only slightly above funding levels two years ago.
Easing the pain is about $1 billion for home-state projects, which are listed in the initial Senate version instead of waiting for a conference to determine earmarks. Senate appropriators followed the House lead in that regard, responding to criticism there has not been enough disclosure of earmark sponsors.
A bright spot for Republicans to be unveiled Tuesday is a $52.9 billion Military Construction-Veterans Affairs bill with a 9 percent increase in veterans' healthcare spending over fiscal 2006, or $3 billion, to $28.7 billion.
Upon the subcommittee's approval Tuesday it would go to the full committee Thursday, as would the Labor-HHS measure, Defense and Transportation-Treasury bills.
Republicans say they have increased the VA healthcare budget by 69 percent since President Bush took office. But Congress has rejected fees to cover costs, and a Congressional Budget Office report issued Friday said the program might put long-term strains on discretionary spending.
At the behest of Senate Veterans Affairs Chairman Larry Craig, R-Idaho, CBO calculated that if Congress continues to appropriate VA funds at the rate of the past seven fiscal years, total VA healthcare spending might reach $54 billion by fiscal 2016, or 5.5 percent of total discretionary spending should the overall budget keep pace with inflation.
Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.