TOPICS

With the denial of two bid protests last week, the Federal Aviation Administration is on track to hand flight service work to Lockheed Martin Corp. in early October, an agency official said Tuesday.

The transfer of work on Oct. 4 would represent a "tremendous victory for us all," said Joann Kansier, director of the FAA's Office of Competitive Sourcing. The 10-year, $1.9 billion contract is expected to produce $2.2 billion in savings over baseline spending on flight services in fiscal 2003.

But opponents of the decision say the contract will deprive a number of the flight service specialists--who provide weather briefings, information on flight restrictions and other pre- and in-flight navigational advice primarily for pilots flying private planes - of federal retirement benefits they had earned, and will jeopardize safety.


RELATED STORIES

Should these opponents succeed at blocking the contract, the FAA stands to pay more than $300 million in penalty fees and would lose the expected savings, the Office of Management and Budget has estimated.

FAA Administrator Marion Blakey's July 20 decision to follow a General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals judge's advice and reject two cases challenging the February award is a good sign, Kansier said. But the contract still faces several potential obstacles.

Lawmakers could pass legislation that would block the outsourcing, for example, though the effort appears to have lost some momentum.

House members in late June approved an amendment to their version of the Transportation-Treasury appropriations bill (H.R. 3058) that would bar the FAA from using 2006 funds to transfer the work. The language has yet to gain traction in the Senate, however.

In April, Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., sponsored a bill that would force FAA to cancel the contract. But he missed an opportunity to introduce an amendment to the Senate version of the Transportation-Treasury appropriations bill during committee deliberations last week.

Johnson was unable to attend the appropriations committee markup because he was involved in negotiations over a separate piece of legislation, said Joshua Rosenblum, a spokesman. The South Dakota senator did, however, send a letter to appropriations subcommittee chairman Kit Bond, R-Mo., and ranking member Patty Murray, D-Wash., encouraging them to deny the FAA $150 million requested to implement the outsourcing decision.

"The FAA's proposal will lead to decreased safety for pilots of small planes because they will no longer be talking to personnel familiar with regional weather and topography," the July 1 letter stated. "The consolidated system will strain service capability because fewer employees will be responsible for a growing system of general air traffic." The letter was signed by Johnson, Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Byron Dorgan, D-N.D.

The committee awarded the full funding despite the letter. Senators will have another chance to introduce an amendment when the full Senate takes up the Transportation-Treasury bill.

Johnson is "working with his colleagues . . . to find the best way to stop these implementation funds from being appropriated," Rosenblum said, but has not decided whether to offer an amendment.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., also has expressed strong opposition to the outsourcing decision. "I will do everything I can to ensure this ill-advised privatization does not proceed," he said in a recent statement. Spokeswoman Leslie Phillips said Monday that he is working "to try to get some sort of legislation," but has not settled on the details.

Kansier said she remains confident she made the right choice. The public-private competition encompassed about 2,500 jobs, making it the largest to date and attractive to bidders willing to invest in significant technological upgrades, she said. She encouraged other agencies to follow FAA's lead and run contests large and "bold" enough to result in meaningful savings for taxpayers.

"This is not a job for the meek or the mild," Kansier said. "This is really a job for the people who want to make a difference."

Kansier spoke on a panel at the Excellence in Government conference, a three-day event co-sponsored by Government Executive.

COMMENTS

  • The sad truth is that the incompetent bureaucrats that have repeatedly failed to modernize Flight Service will retain their jobs and benefits. Marion and Jane bear full responsibility for this failure. They will never be punished for their part in this travesty. On the other-hand Lockheed's proposal would fail if none of the Flight Service specialist sought employment with the new LMAFSS organization.
  • Ms. Kansier is off the mark again. Her statement “the transfer of work on Oct. 4th would represent a tremendous victory for us all,” is typical of the upper management the Federal Aviation Administration employs. How can someone in her position be so excited about putting hundreds of employees on the street without a pension or health insurance? Basically, she does not care! As long as her office and the FAA continue to receive “green lights” from the White House, who cares about hundreds of employees, their families, and their futures. Sometime in 2006, Lockheed Martin will release hundreds of dedicated men and women from the work roles, all under the guise of saving the taxpayers millions of dollars. The FAA has used fuzzy math for years, just research the deployment of the STARS system, which some indications are one billion dollars above original estimates. The STARS program has also been placed on the Inspector General’s watch list. Why the media continues to believe anyone associated with the FAA is beyond me. Employees such as Kansier are continually allowed to make decisions, which affect taxpayers, but in the end cost us more. When will the taxpayers call their Congressional Representatives and demand accountability for the incompetence of these Federal Agencies? Let’s outsource FAA Headquarters, save the taxpayers billions and raise the collective Washington, DC intelligence quotient.
  • I just love when they start talking about saving a billion here and a couple billion there. Has anyone ever heard of the government telling you they did the math and the savings were not there? Of course not. They could say they will save a trillion and who could or would care. The savings will not be there and the contracting will continue until there are zero civil servants left to do the work. That is when King George will be the happiest.

GovExec Live!
GovExec.com reporter Chris Strohm and CongressDaily reporter Greta Wodele will respond to your questions and comments about the proposal to reorganize the Homeland Security Department from noon to 1 p.m. EST on Wed., July 27. Submit your questions early or during the chat.