TOPICS
TOPICS
Follow the leader
With changes to the Defense Department's civilian personnel system seemingly inevitable at this point, it may be time for Pentagon officials to look at how best to make those changes happen.
Last week, Comptroller General David Walker submitted written responses to questions Senate Governmental Affairs Committee members posed during a June 4 hearing on the Defense Department's proposal to overhaul the civilian personnel system, which includes getting rid of automatic pay raises and tying salary increases to performance appraisal ratings.
Walker, who seeks some added personnel flexibilities at his own agency, stressed the need for a strong human capital infrastructure and safeguards as the basis for reform at the Defense Department.
"Based on our experience, while DoD's leadership has the intent and the ability to transform the department, the needed institutional infrastructure is not in place in a vast majority of DoD organizations," Walker wrote. "In the absence of the right institutional infrastructure, granting additional human capital authorities will provide little advantage and could actually end up doing damage if the authorities are not implemented properly by the respective department or agency."
Walker suggested Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his cadre of leaders adopt the Homeland Security Department's strategy for developing its personnel system. Homeland Security leaders, working closely with the Office of Personnel Management, created a design team that included employees and union representatives. Officials conducted town hall meetings around the country and held focus groups, recently winning the praise of American Federation of Government Employees Union President Bobby Harnage for the inclusiveness of the planning process.
"DoD, as any organization seeking to transform, needs to ensure that employees are involved in order to obtain their ideas and gain adequate 'buy-in' for any related transformational efforts," Walker wrote.
Rumsfeld might also consider phasing in the changes as opposed to making wholesale changes, Walker suggested.
"However, as we have noted, in the human capital area, how you do something and when you do it, can be as important as what you do." Walker wrote.
Language Skills
Last week Office of Personnel Management Director Kay Coles James extended agencies' direct hiring authority for people fluent in Arabic to help with rebuilding efforts in Iraq.
"These flexibilities will help agencies move more quickly in their efforts to assist in the reconstruction of Iraq," James said.
Agencies can only hire American citizens under the new authority, with the exception of the Defense Department, which was given permission to hire non-U.S. citizens for positions involved in the reconstruction of Iraq. The authority expires July 1, 2004.
Government-wide direct hiring authority was included in the 2002 Homeland Security Act (H.R. 5005). Now OPM can grant agencies special hiring authority to fill critical positions whenever there is a critical need to fill specific jobs.
In the past few weeks James has used the authority to give agencies permission to skip the standard hiring process for information technology specialists, doctors, nurses and pharmacists. The Securities and Exchange Commission also received direct hiring authority to help recruit more accountants, economists and securities compliance examiners.
COMMENTS
- Let me get this straight. The same employer that brought me the new TSP computer debacle is now going to revamp the system by which I am compensated? Am I worried? You bet. GovExec.com reader Posted July 11, 2003 11:12 AM
- If DoD has to screw with any pay structure it should be military pay. Get rid of housing allowances and uniform allowances and free medical services and just pay the military like you do the civilians that do the same jobs. For military in harms way give them hazard pay while they are in harms way and then stop it when they leave the battle ground. Military get free medical, free vet services, free housing, reduced cost commissary goods, reduced cost exchange goods, uniform allowances, housing allowances, unlimited travel free or at government (my) expense, free training and education, and on and on. We have a volunteer military no longer a draft service - they should be paid and nothing else. fix this problem and then worry about the civilians. Keep in mind that many in IRAQ are from the reserves and guard - not regular military. Those guys get screwed big time while the regulars sit here an continue to collect their benefits and cry they need more and every commercial operation gives military benefits (car dealers, disney etc.) to those that deserve it least. And this is what the DoD thinks is a top priority! Give me a break. GovExec.com reader Posted July 10, 2003 8:09 AM
- DoD and its services have no idea of how to implement anything new! They don't need it and it only will lead to troubles. Before they get any new authority to screw around with salary raises and such, they should have to prove that they have a performance evaluation system that is any good. I have a job descripotion that is ten years old (there are two minor changes to it since I started the job). I have no performance plan and have had no new plan for many years. My evaluation is pass-fail with no way to rank me with any other employee and I am the only civilian in my unit so who do I compete with? This is a nightmare and I will quit as early as I can once this is implemented - at least my retirement will increase by the COLA adjustment. GovExec.com reader Posted July 10, 2003 7:57 AM










