TOPICS

House Armed Services Air and Land Forces Subcommittee Chairman Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, said Thursday that he supports buying 20 more F-22 Raptor fighters, even though he voted against an amendment to the fiscal 2010 defense authorization bill that would keep the program alive.

The additional Lockheed Martin fighters, he said during a breakfast with reporters, would give the Pentagon "breathing room" as it considers its long-term plans and strategy.

Abercrombie said he opposed the F-22 amendment during the Armed Services Committee's markup of the bill this week because of concerns over tapping defense environmental cleanup funds to offset the spending to acquire more F-22s.


RELATED STORIES

The amendment, which the panel approved on a narrow 31-30 vote, would authorize $369 million for advance procurement of 12 F-22s in fiscal 2011. That essentially reverses the Pentagon's decision to end production of the aircraft with the four Raptors in the pending fiscal 2009 supplemental spending bill.

Abercrombie said he did not add funding for any F-22s - whose price tag is $250 million apiece -- in his subcommittee's markup of the authorization bill last week because he was limited in his choice of offsets to Army and Air Force programs under his jurisdiction. But he said he expects Congress ultimately to approve funding for more of the planes.

"It is highly likely that there's going to be an F-22 buy," Abercrombie said Thursday. "The exact number and where the money's coming from is a work in progress."

Meanwhile, Abercrombie expressed frustrations that the Pentagon disregarded Congress, which inserted $523 million into the fiscal 2009 defense authorization bill for advanced procurement for 20 F-22s in fiscal 2010.

"I'm committed to get the Defense Department to do what it was supposed to do in the first place," Abercrombie said. "I think the Congress can't back down off of that. We cannot allow the executive to run roughshod over congressional obligation and responsibility."

He criticized the Pentagon for often wavering in their plans for programs, frequently changing the number of weapons systems or other hardware it intends to buy. For the F-22, for instance, Air Force leaders had pushed to buy 381 fighters, but Defense Secretary Robert Gates decided that 187 fighters are sufficient.

"I don't have a clue whether 187 F-22s is adequate to support our national military strategy because it was another number the day before and it will probably be another number after that," Abercrombie said.

For his part, Gates has said that limiting the F-22 fleet to 187 aircraft was not among the more difficult decisions he made in crafting the fiscal 2010 budget request.

He has argued that 187 F-22s - when coupled with F-35 Joint Strike Fighters and unmanned aerial vehicles -- provides the Air Force with enough firepower to best any military now and in the future.

COMMENTS

  • I totally agree with Wll (June 19)Australia has fought along side the USA in every major since WW1, It's OK for us to fight and die beside US troops, but its not OK to sell us the necessary advanced hardware to defend OUR nation. Russian designed aircraft are proliferating in our region. The F35 JSF will be shot out of the sky by existing Russian designs, how much more by their new 5th Gen Designs. The USA must lift the export ban on the F22 or they will see a major shift in the balance of power away from themselves and their allies and towards Russia, China & their allies
  • Actually, the Air Force DOES want them. The head of air combat command said capping the F-22 at 187 is a high-risk move for national security. The former Air Force secretary and former Air Force Chief of Staff were both fired for saying that the service needed 381. By cutting what was supposed to be 750 F-22 to just 187, Gates is shaping the future foreign policy of the US without congressional input and without a QDR or any analysis. This is why Abercrombie and other democrats are supporting more F-22s. Elected members of congress as well as air force generals have the right to be heard. -Mark
  • Wonderful, Gates doesn't want them and the Air Force doesn't want them but Congress is going to shove additional F-22's down our throats!! This is at the same time they are underfunding the sustainment of the aircraft we already have to the point of not funding Safety Requirements. Guess we should just forget what is needed by our men and women in uniform and listen to Congress, most of who have never been in the military.