TOPICS

The House Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee on Monday unanimously approved a fiscal 2010 spending bill for the Homeland Security Department, including a provision that would extend for two years a program that enables employers to verify the legal status of their workers.

The bill, which passed by voice vote, would provide the department about $42.6 billion in discretionary spending for next fiscal year, which is about 6.5 percent more than current year spending and about 1 percent less than the Obama administration requested.

It also includes $110 million in earmark requests from House members, which is 5 percent less than the House earmarks included in the fiscal 2009 spending bill.


RELATED STORIES

Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman David Price, D-N.C., said the goal is to produce an fiscal 2010 spending bill that has 50 percent fewer dollars for earmarks than the bill enacted in fiscal 2006.

"Drawing on our investigation and analysis of DHS, this mark offers the resources and direction the department needs for the coming fiscal year," Price said in a statement.

Notably, the bill would reauthorize the E-Verify program until 2011. E-Verify enables employers to verify the Social Security number and legal status of a worker online.

Price said the two-year extension was meant to "dovetail" with the "likely timing" for Congress to take up comprehensive legislation overhauling the nation's immigration laws. The administration requested a three-year extension of the program.

"I'm sure this is one item that we'll have further discussion of," Price said after the markup.

Groups calling for immigration reform have been counting on congressional leaders and President Obama to take up comprehensive legislation in the fall and enact it by early next year.

On other fronts, the bill includes a classified level of funding for the department to operate a controversial office that would coordinate the use of military and spy satellites for homeland security missions.

Price said the funding is less than the administration requested because the department has not satisfied congressional concerns about how the National Applications Office will operate.

But some lawmakers, including House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Norman Dicks, D-Wash., want to cut all funding for the office -- an issue that could be raised when the full Appropriations Committee marks up the Homeland Security spending bill on Friday.

Overall funding levels in the bill for Homeland Security agencies resemble the administration's request. For example, the bill would allocate Customs and Border Protection about $10 billion, which is $82 million less than requested.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement would receive $5.4 billion, about $30 million less than requested.

Notably, the bill directs ICE to spend $1.5 billion on finding and deporting illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes. That mandate continues a trend by appropriators over the last two years to target criminal illegal immigrants.

The Transportation Security Administration would receive about $7.7 billion and the Coast Guard about $10 billion.

But appropriators rejected the administration's attempt to reduce funding for the fire grant program, which helps fire departments across the country buy equipment and train personnel. The administration requested $170 million for the program; the bill would allocate $380 million.

The bill does cut $69 million from the administration's request for the department's administrative offices -- a move that Republicans requested.

In addition, the bill includes a one-year extension of the department's authority to regulate security at chemical facilities. That authority is set to expire this year.

COMMENTS

  • Extending it is a good start but they failed to make it mandatory so the scoff laws will continue
  • eVerify is utilized to verify the eligibility of people to work in the US. I think it should also be used to verify people applying for any kind of public assistance, medicare, SS benefits, in short, anything that is tax doller supported. If that person cannot prove they are a US citizen, or otherwise eligible to receive benefits, then they don't get a dime. It is too late to try and remove the immigrants with "anchor" children, but please Congress, amend the Constitution to remove that option for the future. The American workers can barely support themselves, much less all the non-tax paying immigrants that are a drain on the systems. I'll help pay for bus tickets to remove as many as can be identified.
  • NO question that E-Verify should be in-perpetuity, as it's being modified and updated according to the information I have read from Homeland Security. Of course their is a lot of consternation about it's operation, mainly because the businesses that are not using it yet have been brain washed by US. Chamber of Commerce, ACLU and other organizations, who have suspicious reasons for their rhetoric. Then again much of it is consistent lies and propaganda, to attempt to destroy the illegal immigrant worker--ATTRITION--E-Verify computer application. The public should remember where the US Chamber of Commerce and the ACLU get their working capitol from? The free traders and all businesses that enjoy the movement of cheap labor, that cuts into their profits. These are parasites not only prey on the illegal impoverished nationals, but the American taxpayer as well. Mandated taxes--FORCED--on all of us, because over the years we have no enforcement at our borders. We the American people have been left in the dark, happy and ignorant, while our borders have remained methodically unsealed. Many of our lawmakers have been corrupted by Campaign contributions, gifts and large sums of money hidden in brown paper bags. Our country continues to bleed by massive remittances sent out the country by illegal labor. That through many administrations we continue to hemorrhaging from paying all illegal family costs. Hundreds of billions of dollars are hidden in government appropriations, exactly like--EARMARKS--so the public are never aware. California--A SANCTUARY STATE--has committed financially suicide since proposition 187 mysteriously disappeared under liberal judges. We are forever paying benefits for illegal aliens, who dodges our undermanned border. Our Immigration law is not broken, it's just the non-enforcement of the 1986 Simpson/Mazzoli bill. The law works--perhaps too good--so now they must remove it and open the gates wide for the next hordes of illegal alien labor. By taking--OUT--the 1986 law they can spring on us another immigration law that is weaker and allow 20 million or more stay here.