TOPICS

Hundreds of thousands of federal employees and retirees have selected health plans where they could end up paying hefty prices for specialty prescription drugs, according to new findings from the Government Accountability Office.

The study came after Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., asked GAO to look into reports that many Federal Employees Health Benefits Program participants spend thousands of dollars annually on drugs to treat chronic or life-threatening illnesses because they are enrolled in co-insurance plans requiring them to cover a percentage of the drugs' costs rather than a set amount.

Specialty drugs often have unique requirements for storage, patient education and administration -- and they have few competitors or generic alternatives - so the cost can range from $1,200 to $40,000 for a 30-day supply, according to GAO.


RELATED STORIES

"Depending on the plan, these varying requirements can result in a wide range of costs for enrollees for the same drug," the report stated. "For example, we estimate that an enrollee taking the multiple sclerosis drug Betaseron for a year could pay $420 if subject to a co-payment, $2,400 if subject to a co-insurance with a per prescription dollar maximum, or $6,000 if subject to a co-insurance with an annual out-of-pocket maximum."

According to the report, 86 percent of FEHBP enrollees -- 6.6 million people -- have co-payments that limit their costs to $55 on average for a 30-day supply of specialty drugs. But about 11 percent, or 900,000 enrollees, have co-insurance as part of their plan for more than one of 18 specialty drugs. Those enrollees pay, on average, nearly 31 percent of the drugs' cost. About 700,000 have plans that require coinsurance for all 18 of the specialty drugs reviewed. The remaining 3 percent have specialty drugs covered under medical benefits, because they are administered in a therapeutic setting, such as a doctor's office.

GAO also found that cost limits for those with co-insurance vary, depending on the plan. Sixty-three percent of those with co-insurance for more than one of the specialty drugs have a per prescription maximum ranging from $50 to $400 for a 30-day supply. Another 35 percent of the enrollees have an annual out-of-pocket maximum between $1,500 and $7,000. The remaining 2 percent have plans where specialty drugs are not subject to cost-sharing limits, with some exceptions.

John Dicken, GAO's health care director and author of the report, said he did not know how many of the 900,000 enrollees subject to co-insurance are federal workers, and how many are retirees or family members of employees. A 2008 Government Executive analysis found that 87,242 federal employees were subject to co-insurance payments for specialty drugs. The analysis did not include retirees.

Last week Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry said one of his long-term goals is to get medical costs under control for the FEHBP.

COMMENTS

  • More info on the price gouging on prescriptions.....I might add that if I fill my Snythroid through the mail order program offered by BCBS, it costs $65.00 for a 90 day supply because it is label. If I fill it at King Soopers Grocery Store here in Colorado, using the brand label Synthroid, it is $15.47 for the 90 day supply. (I have to take label because of the sensitivy of my thyroid...the generic brand doesn't work for me...causes my thyroid to go up an down.) Anyway...I called and asked the mail order folks why there's is $65.00 for the 90 day supply, and the lady on the end of the phone said, because that is what your insurance company contracted with us for brand. I asked her why would I fill it for $65.00 when I could get it for $15.47 at my local pharmacy for a 90 day supply? She became irritated with me and said because thats what they contracted for. People are getting taken with these prescriptions even with insurance coverage. The costs shouldn't change from mail order to local pharmacy costs. Someone's not monitoring the system. Another prescription I'm on costs me $95.00 (it's actually $92.44) per month with my insurance coverage. It says on my prescription label that my insurance saved me $482.65. Figure that. I still had to pay $95.00 with insurance. How can the American people continue to pay these costs? Unfortuantely, I need these meds....I didn't ask to want to be on them, my body doesn't function without them. I like the rest of the American public are getting hosed on our prescription benefits.
  • When American business cannot deliver value, it creates complexity. It is absurd that an average person, one who has health insurance, has to gamble on what might happen to him or his family next year. I am sure the Honorable Senator Kennedy has no such worries. Why don't all those people in Congress simply make their own health insurance available to all other Americans?
  • Get the FEHB costs & costs for prescriptions under control!!! The FEHB program is more expenseive & covers less for a retiree on a very fixed income. Why doesn't the Fed Gov't have pre-tax benefit for the FEHb & the FSA programs.. That certainly would help retirees. The costs getting under control are the ordinary people's hopes & dreams not the bureaucracy. Chosing between food, gas, or medicine is not what should be happening in this country. People planned for retirement & the market took their money so what is this country doing for the Americans. Definetly not as much as they do for other hot spots in other countries. mjd