TOPICS

House Armed Services Committee ranking member John McHugh, R-N.Y., has been tapped to become Army secretary, President Obama announced Tuesday.

McHugh would join Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, a former GOP House member from Illinois, as Republicans serving in a Democratic administration.

"John shares my belief that a sustainable national security strategy must include a bipartisan consensus at home," Obama said. "He hasn't agreed with every decision my administration has made, but he brings patriotism and a pragmatism that has won him respect on both sides of the aisle."


RELATED STORIES

If confirmed, McHugh would replace Pete Geren, a former Democratic House member from Texas who became Army secretary in 2007 in the wake of revelations of substandard conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, is seen as the frontrunner to replace McHugh as ranking member, according to House GOP aides, although Armed Services Air and Land Forces Subcommittee ranking member Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md., is the next most senior member.

A Thornberry spokesman would not comment on whether the Texas lawmaker has had any conversations with party leaders, but said he is interested in the ranking member slot.

"Mac is anxious to serve and he's certainly going to take the opportunity when it presents itself to discuss with the leader and others in leadership how he can serve," he said.

A Bartlett spokeswoman said her boss "remains interested" in the position, but added that the focus Tuesday should be on McHugh.

House Education and Labor Committee ranking member Howard (Buck) McKeon, R-Calif., also is giving the Armed Services post "serious consideration," his spokeswoman said. McKeon, a senior Armed Services member from a district with several large military installations, did not compete for the post last year, but his spokeswoman said he sees this as a "unique situation."

McHugh, 60, has represented upstate New York's 23rd District for nine terms. His district includes Fort Drum, where the Army's 10th Mountain Division is based.

As ranking member, McHugh has reached across the aisle, most recently on a defense acquisition reform bill that won unanimous congressional support. And he has generally supported Obama's Afghanistan policy, including his decision to send 21,000 more troops to the war zone.

McHugh also has adopted a more moderate approach than many of his GOP colleagues to Obama's plans to close the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. He has refrained from accusing Democrats, as some Republicans have done, of wanting to put out a "welcome mat" for terrorists.

But McHugh, who is known for his candor, has also publicly criticized the Pentagon this year, particularly for its handling of the fiscal 2010 budget.

McHugh recently raised concerns that the Pentagon's internal budget deliberations were too secretive and has argued for more information to explain its decisions. He also has said he fears the sweeping changes made to defense programs in the fiscal 2010 request are dictating the outcome of the comprehensive Quadrennial Defense Review now under way.

About the Army's budget request, McHugh has called the 2.1 percent increase in funding "misleading" because it includes money for programs previously paid for out of supplemental spending.

"The Army is under tremendous pressure based partially on limited resources," McHugh said in his opening statement at a May 14 Army budget hearing. "If we continue down this path, something has to break."

Billy House contributed to this report.

COMMENTS

  • First off, thank y’all for that explanation. Evidently “Just Saying” was noting a possible power play/shift more than bemoaning a possible betrayal. I appreciate that; even while noting that such observances are rarer than rants in this blog. Perhaps I looked before I leaped… Okay, let’s consider that observation. I’ve heard that argument before; that losing a seat here will unbalance the status quo and be a net loss to the country’s check and balances within the two-party system. Not trying to besmirch any of the great states but I must say that IMHO there are few states with worse political reputations than New York, California, and Illinois. I will not comment on those reputations other than to say they exist even as avators and I feel this transition won't greatly change the way the Rest of US think about them. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong. While I admit that over the past 2 and a half years my comments have come to sound like a unity call for the Blue Dogs, I proudly think of myself as a non-denominational centrist. And my local and national voting record confirms that. I am not bound to a two-party system propped up by the Electoral College. My preference would be the elimination of the EC and having 20 candidates per position. Then replacing bad legislators would be MUCH simpler! So when I see an article like this; so when I hear of an experienced politico like Mr. McHugh supposedly “changing sides” I see something totally different. I see an individual knowledgeable in the ways of the world, making a conscious decision for what he perceives as the greater good. I see a man who holds national loyalty higher than party loyalty; and I applaud. And kudos to a president who DOES reach across the aisle and puts a possible opponent into a position he will have to deal with. Yes, this could be an example of “Keep your friends close; but your enemies closer.” But the idealist in me must believe this is yet another example of a president fighting against the established two-party system to bring in someone he believes will do the job regardless of politics. Remember, if McHugh muffs it they both will be blamed.
  • And once again dan ketter brings nothing to the debate table other an his infamous red herrings. Dan, you suck!!!
  • Re Tip off @ 8:12 AM - What Just Saying is talking about is Obama is appointing a senior ranking Republican from the legislature, and the media is reporting that district doesn't have a strong conservative replacement - that it may go Democrat in next year's election. He rightfully reasons it will soon provide another Dem seat in their majority. I am not saying that wood be good or bad, but it is a fair assumption. Further, this appointment DOES move a senior Republican out of the legislature, and is an APPOINTED position. So, what happens when his resignation is called for? Whether for cause or the appointer (Obama) leaves office - there is a hole in the legislature, and a star of the Republican party is put to pasture. So, Just Saying calls this a "clever move" - and it just may be.