TOPICS
TOPICS
Lawmakers question GSA's capacity to handle stimulus projects
The $787 billion Recovery Act will place intense pressure on the acquisition workforce at the General Services Administration, an agency watchdog told a House Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee on Tuesday.
In a typical year, GSA's Public Buildings Service receives $1.3 billion for its capital program. The economic stimulus package, however, gives PBS $5.5 billion to construct new facilities and make existing ones more energy efficient. Additional funds will flow through GSA as other agencies piggyback on its pre-negotiated contracts. Within 18 months, 75 percent of Recovery Act funding must be spent. All of it must be allocated by Sept. 30, 2011.
"As it struggles to meet these challenges, GSA is like a single-engine freight train that suddenly must carry four times its normal load with the addition of more freight cars," GSA Inspector General Brian Miller told the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management. "The anticipated addition of even more cars to that train as agencies start turning over project funding to GSA will put even more strain on the GSA engine. If it hits a hill or bump, the engine may quickly fry and burn out."
Despite the influx in work, PBS is not planning a hiring spree. William Guerin, who runs GSA's Recovery Act Project Management Office, testified that the agency would primarily rely on shifting resources within its existing workforce, rehiring a dozen retirees and adding contractor support.
"Our strategy is to execute Recovery Act activities on an aggressive schedule using streamlined business process and innovative approaches to project execution," Guerin said.
Miller's office has seven full-time employees supervising stimulus funds and is in the process of rehiring 10 to 15 annuitants to supplement its workforce.
But Subcommittee Chairwoman Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., said neither Guerin nor Miller have devoted adequate energy to bringing back retired employees, who, she noted, would not require as much training as a new hires. She asked Guerin to supply a personnel chart by Wednesday tracking all new staff dedicated to the Recovery Act. The chairwoman threatened to hold an oversight hearing every two weeks until she was satisfied with the agency's progress.
Lawmakers also were wary of GSA's contracting plans. "I am greatly concerned that GSA is turning to a bunch of hired hands to do the functions of government," said Rep. Donna Edwards, D-Md. "That worries me tremendously."
GSA's portfolio of Recovery Act construction projects includes a $450 million effort to convert the former St. Elizabeth's psychiatric hospital in Southeast Washington into the Homeland Security Department's new headquarters; $116 million for a new courthouse in Austin, Texas; and $199 million for a new border crossing facility in Nogales, Ariz.
The energy efficiency projects include $117 million to upgrade an Internal Revenue Service facility in Andover, Mass., and $167 million to retrofit the multi-agency Byron Rogers Federal Building in Denver.
COMMENTS
- This is a train wreck waiting to happen. GSA already moves so slowly that they routinely lose prospective lease contracts and have to start the process all over again. Lessors lose patience, abandon the process midstream, and lease their building to someone else. It has happended to our office twice already over the last year and a half. Neal Posted May 27, 2009 11:23 AM
- These are "exciting" times indeed for contracting and acquisition professionals. Many of the comments are right on! I think that we are now beginning to truly reap what was sown in through 1990's through to today in regards to the staffing shortages and skill misalignments that have been so well documented about the acquisition workforce. Until the feds put more "real" emphasis on attracting, training, maintaining and retaining the acquisition workforce, instead of placing the emphasis and the dollars towards forensic investigation, we will continue to be in for a wild ride. When you dramatically increase spend and workload, magnify the complexity of what’s being bought, reduce the cycle times to meet ever increasing mission needs, and yet, keep the workforce at stagnant skill and staffing levels – what do you expect? Peter G. Tuttle, CPCM Posted May 6, 2009 4:44 PM
- I take great offense to the comment made by Rep Donna Edwards (D-MD) in which she stated "I am greatly concerned that GSA is turning to a bunch of hired hands to do the functions of government." May I remind you that the majority of "hired hands" as you refer to us, are honorably discharged military veterans (government) who have served their country. Since my retirement from the United States Air Force in 2004 after 24 years, I have been a contractor with General Dynamics and Alion Science and Technology; contributing heavily to the missions of the uniformed services in an Executive Assistant capacity. Please don't degrade us by using such terminology as this. Norm Wyatt Posted May 6, 2009 2:52 PM









