GovernmentExecutive.com

A senior lawmaker called on his Senate colleagues Thursday to restore almost $100 million in House-ordered cuts to the Homeland Security Department's management programs.

Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said the House had cut $96 million in funding for the DHS Office of the Undersecretary for Management, potentially endangering the implementation of the department's new personnel system, known as MAX HR. Last week, the House voted to take about $26 million specifically targeted for the personnel system and move it to programs that benefit firefighters.

A spokeswoman for Voinovich said DHS management programs, including the new personnel system, were originally slated to receive $146 million.

On Thursday, Voinovich sent a letter to Senate Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg, R-N.H.; Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Thad Cochran, R-Miss.; and Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., the ranking member on the Appropriations Committee. In the letter, Voinovich said he was "concerned" by the House action and he appealed for a unified effort to restore the funding to the final Homeland Security spending bill. Voinovich is chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce and the District of Columbia.

"I am concerned a series of amendments adopted by the House on May 17, 2005, that reduce funding for the Office of Undersecretary for Management by $96 million will jeopardize the department's ability to effectively implement and manage the new personnel system," Voinovich wrote. "Funding during fiscal year 2005 was cut on the Senate floor, resulting in a slowed implementation approach that now extends into fiscal year 2008. These actions continue congressional negligence of the human capital and management needs of the federal government."

When Congress created DHS, agency officials were allowed to develop their own personnel system. Homeland Security leaders have unveiled an overhaul that would streamline the appeals process, reduce union collective bargaining rights and discard the General Schedule pay system. In place of the GS framework, officials are implementing a pay-for-performance system.

Agency officials and lawmakers have said that Congress must provide sufficient funding for training if the overhaul is to be successful. This week, DHS officials warned that the funding cut could endanger training programs.

Lawmakers and staffers in the House said the system has sufficient funding. Rep. Martin Sabo, D-Minn., said he suspects the initial budget request was "inflated".

Voinovich, however, said DHS had prepared a "thoughtful, deliberate and phased implementation plan."

"I strongly recommend full funding of MAX HR and the Office of the Undersecretary for Management, and I stand ready to assist you in achieving this end," Voinovich wrote. "MAX HR represents a major step in efforts to build a cohesive department from 22 disparate agencies, and it must be a success. I sincerely believe that nothing less than our national security is at stake."

COMMENTS

• Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said the House had cut $96 million in funding for the DHS Office of the Undersecretary for Management, potentially endangering the implementation of the department's new personnel system, known as MAX HR. Last week, the House voted to take about $26 million specifically targeted for the personnel system and move it to programs that benefit firefighters. A spokeswoman for Voinovich said DHS management programs, including the new personnel system, were originally slated to receive $146 million. Comment: Will revamping the Pay System reap $146 million in savings? I very seriously doubt that. "I strongly recommend full funding of MAX HR and the Office of the Undersecretary for Management, and I stand ready to assist you in achieving this end," Voinovich wrote. "MAX HR represents a major step in efforts to build a cohesive department from 22 disparate agencies, and it must be a success. I sincerely believe that nothing less than our national security is at stake." Comment on the last sentence: How could not changing the pay system put national security at stake? Is nobody doing their present jobs and must have Pay for Performance to do the job they are receiving pay for now? Lawmakers and staffers in the House said the system have sufficient funding. Rep. Martin Sabo, D-Minn., said he suspects the initial budget request was "inflated". Voinovich, however, said DHS had prepared a "thoughtful, deliberate and phased implementation plan." Comment: "thoughtful, deliberate and phased implementation plan." I would expect no other answer from Voinovich to defend his request. How can a thoughtful, deliberate, and phased implementation plan have so many flaws? Not all members of Congress are fools. GovExec.com reader Posted June 10, 2005 10:17 AM
• These Government "Human Resources" people are sick. They brag about their new DHS personnel system and determined how much it will cost to implement, then they around and cut the budget almost in half. I can see the same (if not worse) for NSPS. Buy law NSPS should have had a Demo project but the Government simply ignored the law. The current administration lost at least 650,000 votes with NSPS now you add in all the DHS employees. I'm a civil servant and voted for Bush... NEVER AGAIN! Once bitten, Twice shy Gil Gil Hernandez Posted May 26, 2005 6:34 PM