GovernmentExecutive.com

The Homeland Security Department is not adequately inspecting cargo and containers headed for the United States from foreign seaports, according to Government Accountability Office findings released Wednesday and a separate Senate panel investigation.

Two GAO reports and a 20-month congressional investigation into the department's efforts to secure cargo and containers found that it is inspecting less than 1 percent of containers overseas and 17.5 percent of high-risk cargo.

Also, the department has certified importers for expedited inspections without a thorough validation of their supply chain security. And technology to screen cargo and containers at ports overseas are "untested" and of "unknown quality," said the panel in a release announcing the findings.

"Ensuring the security of our global supply chain is critical to homeland security since maritime trade accounts for over 25 percent of the U.S. [gross domestic product] and many experts believe that terrorists are likely to exploit the inherent vulnerabilities of the global supply chain for their nefarious purposes," said Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Investigations Subcommittee, which conducted the investigation.

The GAO, U.S. Customs Commissioner Robert Bonner and former Homeland Security officials are slated to testify Thursday about the issue before the subcommittee.

After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the department started two international programs to secure shipments entering the country without adversely affecting the flow of commerce.

Companies belonging to the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism program voluntarily work with the department to bolster security of their goods in exchange for expedited inspections. C-TPAT importers are seven times less likely to undergo inspections of their cargo, according to a release by the subcommittee.

The second program, Container Security Initiative, enables U.S. officials to inspect high-risk containers at foreign ports before the ship departs for U.S. ports. The officials have deployed detection equipment in 36 foreign ports, but GAO found the department has "limited assurance that the equipment in use can successfully detect all" weapons of mass destruction.

House Energy and Commerce ranking member John Dingell, D-Mich., Wednesday criticized the department for failing to meet expectations.

"The commissioner of Customs has assured us repeatedly that they have in place a 'layer-in-depth' system to protect the nation from terrorists using shipping containers to smuggle WMDs into the U.S." Dingell said. "Yet each time we peel back a layer we find there is less than promised."

The GAO recommended the department bolster its process for validating importers by establishing performance measures, goals and adequate internal controls to manage the program. For the container security program, the GAO recommended the department draft technical requirements for the detection equipment overseas.

The Investigations Subcommittee plans to hold follow-up hearings this fall to review the department's progress in implementing GAO's recommendations.

COMMENTS

• These are pretty scary comments, coming from people in the know. What's even scarier is the lack of response from other readers, the general public, and our leaders in the Administration and Congress, who seem to be ignoring this issue, at least until the next big terrorist attack. GovExec.com reader Posted June 22, 2005 1:08 PM
• Too bad Congress and the GAO didn't read the Government Executive "Mailbag" feature on this topic. It seems that many of those who responded to this article have a lot of expertise in this area, and what they say has a great deal of value in this debate. The same goes for other articles and comments posted here as well. Unfortunately, the typical appointed government manager/bureaucrat puts in his or her "hardship" tour for a year or so before fleeing back to the big bucks private sector. They wouldn't even think of consulting with those who really know about these issues, namely, those who choose government service as a career, rather than coming in for a year or two and screwing things up! GovExec.com reader Posted June 8, 2005 2:31 PM
• Thanks, Special Agent, DHS ICE for your comments re my service. In reading the prior 'drivel' by someone who wished to give me a quarter, it's obvious that they're not a current or retired government worker. As I've stated in another posting, ad hominem attacks against a poster do not state a valid argument, but they do indicate the level of maturity displayed. Just for the record, I was merely describing my experience with this problem, not praising myself. This nasty, unknown poster doesn't choose to even describe his/her identity with a job description, what does that tell you? But we both know that the problem re cargo exists, and I personally commend you, your collegues, inspectors, and all other WORKING Federal LEOs stuck in an impossible situation. Best Regards! GovExec.com reader Posted June 7, 2005 8:56 AM