TOPICS
TOPICS
OSHA gives up on regulatory reform program
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is giving up on a plan to replace hard-nosed inspections with a voluntary workplace safety improvement program, following a court decision that struck down the voluntary program.
On Monday, OSHA announced that the agency is targeting 2,200 dangerous workplaces for inspections by the end of the year.
Under the voluntary program struck down by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals two weeks ago, those workplaces would have been able to reduce their chances for an inspection, which are time-consuming and can often lead to heavy fines, by agreeing to develop stringent workplace safety policies.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which challenged the program in court, argued that the "voluntary" program was coercive and mandated safety standards beyond what is called for in federal law. The court ruled that OSHA should have conducted a formal rulemaking before implementing the program, so that such concerns could have been factored into the agency's plans.
An OSHA spokesman said Tuesday that the agency had no plans for reviving the Cooperative Compliance Program through a formal rulemaking. The agency has not made a decision on whether to appeal the circuit court's ruling.
RELATED STORIES:
Court shoots down OSHA reform program
(Apr. 13, 1999)
OSHA faces results measurement challenge
(February 1999)
OSHA seeks safety at federal agencies
(November 1998)
Quotas for OSHA inspectors banned
(June 30, 1998)
OSHA gets tough again as court halts cooperative program
(April 14, 1998)
OSHA faces uncooperative compliance
(March 11, 1998)
OSHA expands reg reform project
(Dec. 8, 1997)
OSHA reinvents itself
(May 1997)
Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.