TOPICS
TOPICS
GAO: Military gear for sale on Web poses security risk
Need F-14 components? Try eBay. A team of undercover GAO agents found parts for the fighter plane as well as body armor, night vision goggles and other military items for sale to the highest bidder on eBay, Craigslist.org and other Web sites that allow person-to-person sales, the congressional auditing agency announced Thursday.
Between January 2007 and March, agents using only credit cards, mailing addresses and false names easily bought the items, many of which were stolen from the U.S. military, Gregory Kutz, GAO managing director for forensic audits and special investigations, told a House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee.
Though the Web-based companies did not break the law and many military items can be purchased legally, the sales suggest foreign states, criminals and terrorists can easily buy sensitive American military equipment, investigators and lawmakers said.
The items GAO bought are on a list of munitions that are illegal to sell overseas without Defense Department approval, Kutz said.
"It doesn't take a lot of imagination to understand the troubling nature of some of these items being sold online, said House Oversight and Government Reform National Security Subcommittee Chairman John Tierney, D-Mass.
Tierney noted GAO bought Army combat uniforms on eBay a few months after insurgents dressed in U.S. military garb killed five U.S. service members in Karbala, Iraq, in January 2007. Iran, believed to be the only country still flying F-14 Tomcats, was the intended recipient of $750,000 worth of F-14 parts that a Florida man was arrested for trying to export in 2003, Kutz said.
States including China and Russia are part of a robust foreign market for U.S. military equipment, Defense Department Deputy Inspector General for Inspections Charles Beardall testified. GAO's investigation follows undercover investigations in 2002 and 2003 that showed the Defense Department was improperly selling excess sensitive military equipment, such as chemical protective suits, online.
Kutz said that while the department has curtailed such sales, GAO's recent investigation shows U.S. military equipment could be sent overseas through middlemen using the Internet.
Tod Cohen, vice president for government relations at eBay, said the company bars the sale of military ordnance and "essentially prohibits" selling military items not properly disposed of under Defense Department rules.
The company has a fraud-investigations team that cooperates extensively with government agencies to block sales of military equipment on its site. And it uses detection tools to flag suspicious listings, Cohen added. But with up to 7 million items listed daily, "it is a challenge to enforce our policies," he said.
Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster said his company, which offers free classified advertisements in 450 localities, was improperly described by GAO as a global marketplace, though he acknowledged some users do sell to people overseas.
Buckmaster and Cohen argued any legislation restricting sales of military items should be simple and not limited to online vendors.
"The key is . . . clear rules," Cohen said.
With a hodgepodge of rules applying to sales of different military equipment, Tierney said Congress should very seriously consider a ban on sale of sensitive items.
COMMENTS
- Nothing but a fluff piece for GAO. Who didn't know that was happening? Way to run to the media for a little media attention on old news. I bought a tank engine off e-bay for shipment overseas during an investigation 4 years ago. Anyone who does these types of investigation has known for years that this was going on. Now for the real hard to swallow truth. Most of these items for sale are supplied by our own Military through DRMO! That's who should be investigated. Their practises concerning the end user of sensitive military equipment it absolutely atrocious. We had a case awhile back where we seized F-14 parts destined for Iran, purchased through DRMO. The seized F-14 parts were returned to the govt. Something like 2-3 years later, on another search warrant for selling aircraft parts to iran without a State Dept. license, guess what we find? The same EXACT F-14 parts seized in the previous investigation. Purchased from DRMO with the EVIDENCE stickers from the previous case still on them. The sticker listed seizure number, case number etc. We had a case where a guy was illegally selling pilot helmets with active heads up displays purchased from DRMO. If that was any other company they would be responsible for the end user. Most of the investigations I have been involved with concerning military equipment, the items have come from DRMO. We don't hold them to the same standards as we do other non govt. companies. If we did they would have been in serious trouble 10 times over. They aren't easy to deal with either and they don't have a good record keeping system either. So tracking who bought what can be rather difficult. The least DRMO can do is supply a list of customers so we can do a preliminary pre-emptive check or some sort of follow up to see exactly where some of the sensitve military equipment is going. Now go do a story on that GAO. shane Posted April 11, 2008 1:14 PM
- Obviously, tight control is needed over some items. This doesn't mean that the DoD should be burying good used office furniture in landfills, or cutting up serviceable cars and trucks, toolboxes, etc. for scrap. As far as I'm concerned, that's fraud, waste and abuse. I know that there are a lot of nonsensitive items that DRMO doesn't want to deal with (and is willing to "Abandon and Destruct" in place), that are perfectly useful. If the DoD is willing to throw it away, they should at least allow the generating bases and posts to try to sell it and put the money back into their budgets or donate it to charity. Clear LOGICAL rules are definitely needed. noman Posted April 11, 2008 1:10 PM
- The focus of the investigation shouldn't be on the availability of former military equipment on ebay or Craig's List. It should be examining how the equipment was "stolen" from the military. Identify the thieves, publish their names, prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. Leave ebay and Craig's List alone. Dennis Yoakam Posted April 11, 2008 12:21 PM









