TOPICS

Federal employees traveling on federal holidays as part of their jobs are not entitled to compensatory time off, under final rules issued Tuesday by the Office of Personnel Management.

"Compensatory time off for travel may be earned by an employee only for time spent in a travel status away from the employee's official duty station when such time is not otherwise compensable," the rules stated.

The final regulation will go into effect May 17, according to a notice published in the Federal Register. OPM reviewed comments submitted by agency officials, union representatives and members of the public in response to a 2005 draft proposal.


RELATED STORIES

The National Treasury Employees Union, which had recommended that employees be compensated for work-related holiday travel, expressed disappointment.

"NTEU's efforts led to establishment of this important program for federal employees, and I would have hoped that OPM, in its rule-making, would apply it in the broadest possible context, consistent with Congress's intent," said Colleen Kelley, the union's president.

The 2004 Federal Workforce Flexibility Act allows agencies to compensate employees with time off for business travel they conduct outside of normal working hours.

"The need for all this resulted from inconsistent approaches by agencies for either granting or not granting comp time," said Mike Orenstein, a spokesman for OPM. "These rules put into regulation what is allowed and during what periods."

Under the final rules, the compensatory leave will be credited in direct proportion to the amount of time spent on authorized travel for work, and agencies will be responsible for managing their policies.

The regulations apply only to workers who are defined as employees under Title 5 regulations. This excludes Senior Executive Service personnel, Foreign Service Officers and wage grade employees, the notice said.

OPM also revised the definition of "travel" to clarify that time spent traveling in connection with union activities is not creditable for the purpose of earning compensatory time off. Also, travel time accrued as a result of a change of job or location is not eligible, the notice said.

The new rules also clarify that an employee must use his or her accrued compensatory time off within 26 pay periods after it is earned. The rules permit the head of an agency to extend this time limit if an emergency prevents an employee from using the benefit.

Additionally, in a departure from the draft proposal, employees do not have to exclude time spent for meals from the computation used to determine time off. It is not practical for agencies to make refined distinctions between employees who choose to eat at the terminal restaurant and those who choose to eat while walking or waiting at the gate, the notice said.

During the comment period, some agency officials expressed concern that employees who travel internationally on a regular basis would rapidly accrue compensatory time off, and suggested that OPM limit the amount of comp time an employee can earn. But OPM argued that any such change would have to be made by Congress.

"NTEU will be working with agency management to ensure that federal employees enjoy the full benefits envisioned in the compensatory time program," Kelley said.

COMMENTS

  • It looks like OPM is taking the position that because the employee is already being compensated for the Holiday (a day off with pay), that you cannot recieve additional compensation for mandatory travel on a holiday. My issue is that I am afraid that OPM has set a predence for requiring people to "preform duties" on a Holiday because they already get "compensated" for the Holiday! What's next, requiring you to come into the office on the Holiday to catch up on a few late items or get ready for the meeting the next day, without due compensation, oh wait, you are alredy paid for that day! They don't have to compensate you! Now if you are required to "work" on a Holiday because of your mission or schedule you get Holiday Premium, pay. Since when has travel not been work?
  • If agencies had been following the law properly this issue would never have come up. OPM liked to quote the rule saying employees are not paid for travel outside their assigned tour of duty. BUT you never saw them quoting the law that required federal agencies to adjust an employee's tour of duty to cover any work requirments that were known in advance. Travel is very rarely scheduled within a pay period, the requirement to travel and when that travel will be conducted is almost always known well in advance of the actual travel. If agencies were following the law, they would have been adjusting the employee's tour of duty to include the directed travel whenever that requirement was known prior to the pay period in which the travel occurs.
  • For the most part when travel is being set up Holidays are given into consideration when trainings etc. are being scheduled. It appears that most of the time it is at the travelers discretion as to whether or not to travel on a holiday however if they choose to travel on a holiday that was most probable their choice and 1. should not complain if not compensated due to it being their choice or 2. work it out with their manager who may grant unofficial time for their travel. If the holiday travel was mandatory then it may be appropriate for the agency to compensate otherwise, you just have to work around it. It seems pretty cut & dry to me.