TOPICS

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., says he supports the idea of appointing a senior-level official in the Bush administration to manage operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, adding that his committee might be able to play "a constructive role" in creating the new post.

"I like the idea," Lieberman told CongressDaily in an interview Thursday. "For all the people who have argued that the administration has been too focused on the military aspect of Iraq and Afghanistan, this is a way of saying, as I understand it, that ultimate victory is going to come not just because of military success but also . . . mostly because of political and economic success."

The Washington Post reported this week that aides to President Bush are evaluating a plan to create a so-called czar for Iraq and Afghanistan who would be empowered to cut through bureaucratic obstacles.


RELATED STORIES

Lieberman, an independent who parts with Democrats on Iraq, said he envisions such a czar being primarily responsible for the non-military aspects of "post-conflict management," particularly in supporting provisional reconstruction teams. "This is a line that I think is unique and interesting to me and to our committee and so you can count on us to follow it," he said.

Lieberman's committee held a hearing last August to examine problems civilian agencies were having coordinating reconstruction efforts in Iraq.

The April 2 announcement that Meghan O'Sullivan is resigning as deputy national security adviser for Iraq and Afghanistan opens the door to create the new post, Lieberman said. But the position would likely have to be outside the National Security Council structure to work, he added.

"I think to get somebody really top notch, you'd probably have to take the person out of the NSC and have the person reporting probably directly to the president," he said. "One might say the NSC should be doing it but they're not an administrative operation."

Lieberman acknowledged the czar would be responsible for coordinating some military aspects of reconstruction but indicated that would be primarily related to providing security for civilian agencies. He also said the choice would not become part of the military chain-of-command, emphasizing that Army Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, should continue to report to Adm. William Fallon, who heads the U.S. Central Command.

Provincial reconstruction teams in Iraq were first formed in 2005, Lieberman said, but could not get the necessary military protection from the Defense Department under the management of then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

"I think the folks at the Pentagon, Rumsfeld maybe, felt that if we put all of these soldiers to protect these civilians that are trying to rebuild the provinces we're going to have to take them away from other combat that they're involved in. We should have done both," Lieberman said.

Lieberman also said that a new czar would do essentially what L. Paul Bremer was supposed to do as head of the Coalition Provisional Authority until 2004. But Lieberman said the biggest difference now is that Iraq has its own government.

COMMENTS

  • Then what is the role of "State's" Timothy Carney?
  • On the Op-Ed page of the April 16 Washington Post is a very informative column by one of the three senior generals who was approached about this job and declined it. The General had some very illuminating comments about how the role was explained to him, and how he viewed it as a job that could not be accomplished. Good reading.
  • Everyone in the Bush camp would prefer a czar of everything! That is the way Bush likes to rule - as a czar! Gone are individual rights, search everyone everywhere for any reason, listen in on phone calls, increase spending to your friends and relatives through no bid contracts, hold people in POIW camps for years with little or no known reasons, continue a war based on lies so you can give your friends mort money, CZAR BUSH is already there why do we need more Czars?