TOPICS

Sick leave can accumulate quickly as unused days from the 13 granted annually to federal employees carry over year after year. For employees under the older Civil Service Retirement System, leftover sick days are credited toward retirement pensions. But Federal Employee Retirement System workers have no such luck.

This discrepancy is causing FERS employees to use substantially more sick leave than their CSRS counterparts, the Congressional Research Service reported in 2004. One possible interpretation is that FERS employees calling in sick may not truly have the sniffles.

Now, a coalition of federal management groups is coalescing around the issue. The newly formed Government Managers Coalition -- made up of the Federal Aviation Administration Managers Association, Federal Managers Association, National Council of Social Security Management Associations, Professional Managers Association and Senior Executives Association -- is pushing compensation for FERS employees' unused sick days as one of its first agenda items.


RELATED STORIES

"We really see this as a management issue of finding a creative way to encourage employees to be more results-oriented while maintaining their health," said Thomas Richards, government affairs representative for the FMA.

Granting extra pension money for unused sick leave is expensive, and coalition leaders said they understand that the introduction of FERS in 1986 tried to trim the cost of federal employment entitlements and loosen the so-called "golden handcuffs," which forced workers to stay in the civil service or lose valuable benefits.

As an answer, the coalition is looking at a New York state public employees program that puts funds calculated from unused sick leave into an account to help pay health insurance premiums in retirement years.

"With the rising costs of health care and the fact that retirees don't see the same tax benefits on their premiums that active employees do," Richards said, "this is one way of alleviating some of the stress of health care benefits that many retirees face."

Leaders of the coalition, which just announced its formation Monday, said they are intrigued by the New York solution, but are not wedded to it.

"We're not necessarily saying it has got to be this solution but here is a creative solution that has been tried and something needs to be done," said William Bransford, general counsel for SEA. "It's just going to get worse as more and more [FERS] employees near retirement."

Bransford said the group will be lobbying members of Congress and the subcommittees that oversee federal workforce issues to take action on FERS sick leave policy.

"The difficulty is going to be convincing the members of Congress that whatever cost is associated with the reform is going to be made up in increased productivity," Bransford said.

Perhaps the associations will have more sway under the umbrella of the coalition. The group also is advocating extended probationary periods for most new federal employees and more training for supervisors.

"By uniting, we can be sure that these solutions, which can and will make a big difference, receive the attention they deserve on the Hill and in the White House," said Darryl Perkinson, president of FMA.

COMMENTS

  • I don’t think anything will be done to pay FERS employees for unused sick leave. There is a proposed bill to pay 10% of high three for all sick leave over 500 hours. This would be something and might encourage some people to not abuse the time off. For more equitability between FERS and CSRS, I would personally like to see the wage cap for FERS supplement removed. If a FERS retiree makes more than the social security cap, ($13,560 in 2008) they have to pay $1 for every $2 over the cap. I can work after FERS retirement, just can’t earn much, a CSRS retiree has no wage cap.
  • In response to a previous comment on equitability between FERS & CSRS regarding sick leave and matching TSP funds. If you're going to take the arguement that far, then you need to also consider CSRS employees don't have social security deductions and are getting their FULL social security in their annuity when retiring at age 55 or 56 with the appropriate years of service. If I retire under FERS at age 56, then I need to wait 14 years to get my FULL social security benefit. CSRS employee can also work another job after federal service and build some social security benefits. FERS is a 3 tiered retirement: FERS annuity, TSP, & social security. Remember...while CSRS don't get matching funds, they can also benefit from IRS maximum deposits into the TSP just like FERS employees, thus vastly improving their benefits in retirement. As a manager, I also deal with employee abuse of sick leave at times. The only fair(er) thing to do is to allow sick leave balances to apply to years of service to improve FERS retirement annuities.
  • As a CSRS employee for over 28 years, I had the choice of staying with CSRS or choosing FERS in 1987-88. One the major reasons I stayed with CSRS was the fact that FERS does not allow accrued sick leave to count toward retirement. However, CSRS does not provide matching TSP contributions from the employer and FERS does. It would be unfair, after the fact, 20 years later, to now offer FERS employees a benefit for accrured sick leave! If I had known that I may very well have switched to FERS! It is also unfair to now improve or create a new benefit for FERS with out likewise creating or improveing a benefit for CSRS employees. The two systems were never intended to be the same, but if folks want FERS to be more like CSRS, than it is only fair that CSRS be more like FERS by offering matching TSP contributions to CSRS employees.