TOPICS
TOPICS
Postmaster General to face Congress over compensation
With the U.S. Postal Service headed for its third year with a multibillion-dollar deficit, Postmaster General John Potter will face tough questioning on Capitol Hill on Wednesday to explain the red ink as well as his compensation package.
As last week's outrage over the American International Group executive bonus fiasco remains fresh in members' minds, House Oversight and Government Reform Federal Workforce, Postal Service and the District of Columbia Subcommittee Chairman Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., promised to grill Potter, saying "the huge increase in pay for Mr. Potter is incongruent with the post office's recent performance."
The Postal Service, which is a semigovernment agency that has not received an operational subsidy from Congress since 1982, faces another massive deficit that Potter estimates will reach $6 billion in fiscal 2009.
This follows deficits of $2.8 billion in fiscal 2008 and $5.1 billion in fiscal 2007. The service last turned a profit of $900 million in fiscal 2006. Potter's $857,459 package in includes base compensation for fiscal 2008 listed at $263,575, according to Postal Regulatory Commission records with a $135,041 performance incentive bonus, deferred until he leaves office. His other compensation includes $77,347 in perks, including parking, life insurance premiums, airline clubs, spousal travel and security, plus his $381,496 pension.
Also deferred until he leaves office is accrued annual leave totaling more than $245,000, as of September 2008, which he will receive in a lump sum. He has been in office since June 2001.
The salary for Potter and four lower-level postal executives was approved by the U.S. Postal Service's Board of Governors in May 2007, retroactive to January 2007. It first came to light in January under a Freedom of Information Act request by a trade publication. The board boosted Potter's salary from $186,600 to $258,840 for fiscal 2007, but with deferred compensation and performance incentive pay his compensation came to more than $850,000 that year and remained the same for fiscal 2008. The pay increases for Potter and other top postal executives are a result of a 2006 Postal Reorganization Act approved by Congress that allowed increases in salary for top officers. Board of Governors Chairman Carolyn Gallagher and Postal Regulatory Commission Chairman Dan Blair are also scheduled to appear before the subcommittee on Wednesday to explain the pay structure.
Potter told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Federal Financial Management Subcommittee in January the financial situation of the mail service is "grave." To save money, he is proposing cutting back six-day mail delivery to five days -- which would require congressional approval to delete a rider on appropriations bills requiring six-day mail service. The price of a first-class stamp is due to go from 42 to 44 cents in May and commercial mail rates are also scheduled to rise. To help reduce the deficit Potter wants Congress to end a structural requirement that it pre-fund health benefits of future retirees that he says will save $2 billion in fiscal 2009. Although Potter and other top executives have received big pay boosts, he told the Senate panel he has frozen all their pay to 2008 levels.
COMMENTS
- As a retired USPS injured employee, I continued to work, WANTED to work, was harrassed continually, not allowed to work sometimes, disrespected, humiliated in front of coworkers, not allowed the same rights and benefits of fellow coworkers, yet all I wanted was to continue to work and do my job. I wasn't allowed to do so with any type of dignity. I worked harder than most people that had never been injured just to prove to mgmt that I COULD do my job, was willing to do even more than my job required, etc. Mgmt never simply does the "right" thing because they might get caught by their boss. It's all about the numbers, people are not treated like people. I have seen what they do to the carriers, the clerks, the mail handlers. They always want more with less, threatening people with their jobs-I don't mean injured people, either. Regular folks. I was actually diagnosed with PTSD and tried to file a worker's comp claim, but of course it's hard to prove, even with documentation. You really do go crazy. Thank God I finally made it to retirement. Full retirement. PMG Potter is not liked by anyone in the USPS. He has done nothing for morale-he is running the PO into the ground. I agree-he doesn't deserve his position or his salary or his perks. Why is the PO paying to move mgrs to move because they got promoted? Let them sell their own homes, move themselves, etc. That would save a bundle.There are tons of ways for the PO to save money-cutting one day of delvery is not it. Doesn't help anyone to do that. jewels Posted April 9, 2009 6:21 PM
- This guy needs to be behind bars ... not leading the way on Postal reform. Joe the Worker Posted March 31, 2009 11:50 PM
- "If supervisors and managers tried to run companies or dividions in the private sector the way they do in the Postal Service now,they would be fired, much be given performance bonuses." Mr. Duran, you've got it backwards: this country's sociopathic leadership is not rewarded because of performance; they are rewarded because they know how to circle the wagons against paeans (peasants) like us. They are rewarded simply because they do the CEO's and executive board's bidding. Greedy amoralists have stuck it to us long enough. I'm not one for violence, but I am one for using the court and penal systems as a new country club for our insatiably greedy sociopaths. Jackson Richards Posted March 30, 2009 10:11 AM
CORRECTION: The original version of this story incorrectly referred to the Postal Rate Regulatory Commission. The correct name of the organization is the Postal Regulatory Commission.









