TOPICS
TOPICS
Lieberman renews push for easier access to CRS reports
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., on Wednesday resumed a perennial attempt by some lawmakers and open government advocates to make reports produced by the Congressional Research Service more easily accessible to the public.
In a letter to Senate Rules Committee Chairman Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., he called for a sanctioned, automatically updated clearinghouse for the documents so "those with power and those without have equal access to this important resource."
Over the past decade, a series of bills requiring public access to CRS reports has made little progress, including a 2007 measure introduced by former Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn. Under the chairmanship of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., last Congress, the Rules Committee authorized CRS to create software to let senators place individual reports on their Web sites. That did not go far enough, Lieberman wrote. Last Congress, he introduced a resolution with Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ranking member Susan Collins, R-Maine, and others that called for a more accessible system.
"A more effective system would provide constituents with tools similar to those used by congressional staff, with material presented by topic and the capability to search across all reports and issue briefs," he told Schumer.
In addition to piecemeal disclosures by lawmakers, CRS reports are made available through pay services and more intermittently at OpenCRS.com, a free Web database offered by the Center for Democracy and Technology.
Demand for the reports is so great that this month, thousands of documents -- representing several years' worth of work by CRS analysts -- were placed on the Wikileaks.org site, Lieberman noted. ShowUsTheData.org, a site launched by CDT and Open the Government last month on the heels of President Obama's Day One transparency directive, lists CRS reports as the top priority. Efforts like OpenCRS and Wikileaks allow more reports to enter the public domain but do not ensure the most accurate and up-to-date information is available, Lieberman wrote.
CRS has been resistant to change.
"They don't want to become politicized and feel that by being more open, they could face potential criticism," CDT Vice President Ari Schwartz said.
But with White House and Hill leadership emphasizing transparency, Lieberman's effort could gain traction, Schwartz said.
A CRS official could not be reached for comment.
COMMENTS
- I've found errors, misconstructed laws, and shorten regulations which lead me not to wholly trust that OpenCRS. And, to add insult to injury, the errors always placed the rights of the American People in jeopardy. I found incomplete interpretations in the laws always favoring the Government, especially, where pension rights laws were passed by Congress. Therefore, whether Lieberman or any other Congressional leader, there needs to be checks and balances in place to ensure a correct and proper interpretation of Congress mandates. After all, this is why we elected them. GERALDINE Posted March 9, 2009 11:06 PM
- Lieberman? Hasn't he burned his political-capital candle at both ends already? Due to his past self-serving performances at stabbing his party and the American soldier in the back, I can't help but conclude anytime he opens his capacious maw that nothing but sewer effluent is about to spew forth. Jackson Richards Posted March 6, 2009 1:08 PM
- I must be in my dotage. If GAO and CBO, which are also creatures of the legislative branch can disseminate their work products in the public domain, without becoming thereby "politicized," why can't I grasp why CRS shrinks from similar public access. If its fear on their part of "potential criticism" (which I suspect is the real reason), well, golly, someone may wish to inform CRS that this is a participatory democracy and that robust civic debate is supposed to be its hallmark, with few holds barred in the process. Methinks CRS is a wee bit deficient when it comes to understanding the expectations of accountability and transparency. Jeremiah Posted March 5, 2009 5:34 PM









