TOPICS
TOPICS
Boeing review finds no widespread ethics violations
A review commissioned by Boeing has concluded that the company has at times not properly followed its own rules when hiring current and former federal executives. But the review did not find evidence of widespread misconduct at the Defense's Department second-largest contractor.
Boeing hired former Sen. Warren Rudman, R-N.H., to head an outside evaluation of its hiring practices after the company fired two top executives last fall for engaging in unethical hiring practices.
Darleen Druyun, a former top Air Force procurement executive, was fired after less than a year as senior executive at the aerospace giant for not disclosing that she was negotiating a job with Boeing while overseeing billions of dollars in Air Force contracts with the firm. Michael Sears, the company's chief financial officer, who talked with Druyun about the job, also was ousted last fall.
The Defense Department inspector general is reviewing contracts Druyun oversaw, including a multibillion-dollar deal to lease tanker aircraft from Boeing. That review is not slated for completion until at least May 2004. Also, the Justice Department is determining whether Druyun and Sears might have obstructed justice in concealing their contacts.
The review stated: "It would be a mistake to conclude that the Darleen Druyun incident reflects a lack of knowledge or concern regarding the company's obligations." Nonetheless, the review, which included interviews with dozens of former federal officials now working for Boeing, offered several recommendations for ensuring conflict-of-interest rules are not violated.
Among the suggestions: establishing a central system at Boeing for hiring current and former government employees who would monitor potential conflicts of interest; improving record-keeping and monitoring of former federal workers' compliance with ethics rules once they join Boeing; improving corporate training and knowledge of rules for hiring federal workers; and conducting an audit of hiring practices at least every two years.
"There is no magic bullet to ensure that everyone follows established policies and procedures in hiring government employees, but additional training, safeguards and centralized oversight and control can substantially reduce the risk that mistakes will be made in the hiring process," the report noted.
COMMENTS
- Government corruption at its best. If you are a General of any kind in the military, your chances of a job in the civilian sector with a government defense contractor is almost a lock. The governement knows this and encourages it. Why would we, the little people, even think there would be a change in the morals of the guilty. They are corrupt people and will remain that way. The next time you see a General officer remember, you are looking at a crook, the same goes for a politician too. GovExec.com reader Posted March 11, 2004 7:35 AM
- Oh, please! I can't even own Boeing stock because it's a conflict of interest. "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." There's just no better way to say it. GovExec.com reader Posted March 10, 2004 1:38 PM
- This is a no-brainer! Do not allow government employees (including military) to go to work for government contractors for at least five years after termination of government employment. The contractors mainly hire government people to get access to sell more business. That is unethical, destroys competition in government acquisition and stops small new companies from becoming prime government contractors. Boeing, Grumman and other weapons manufacturers have entered the computer and systems business and do not know how to manage it. However, they can sell the jobs because they know the people - not because they have the capability or experience! Do not allow government people to work for these companies following government service. HUD employees want to go to work for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, DoD and military employees want to go to work for defense contractors, etc etc etc. That means that the government employees will serve the contractors while they are government employees in the hope of being hired when they retire or decide to change jobs for better pay. Congress should stop this inbreeding process because it has led to government action that favors contractors (especially the big ones) and costs the taxpayers' significant money! GovExec.com reader Posted March 10, 2004 6:48 AM









