TOPICS
TOPICS
Senator says offshore outsourcing provision must be revisited
Senate Finance Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said Tuesday that he believed a Senate-approved amendment to the corporate tax bill that limits outsourcing of federal contracts to overseas workers would have to be modified in conference to secure the support of President Bush.
The amendment, a compromise worked out by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and Finance ranking member Max Baucus, D-Mont., includes a number of broad exceptions including contracts for national security purposes and contracts involving countries that have already opened their procurement markets to U.S. bidders through international agreements. But Grassley said those exceptions did not go far enough and would have to be revisited in conference.
"I think it will have to be modified further if we are going to get the White House to sign it," he said.
In the House, Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, said Tuesday he would like to move corporate tax legislation that repeals the foreign sales corporation/extra-territorial income exclusion to the House floor within the next four weeks.
"I would hope we could get that bill to the floor before we break for the Easter recess," DeLay said.
DeLay deferred to Ways and Means Chairman William Thomas, R-Calif., about the bill's content, but noted that Thomas' latest proposal included a provision to address the alternative minimum tax. The Ways and Means-passed FSC/ETI bill would provide relief from the corporate AMT at a cost of $6.7 billion over 10 years. Grassley said he believed if the Senate could pass a FSC/ETI bill, it would help break the logjam in the House by showing the extent of bipartisan support for many of the same proposals Thomas is putting forward.
DeLay, asked about the prospects for extending or making permanent previously passed tax cuts, said he thought the House would support whatever tax relief that could pass the Senate -- so long as it did not include a tax increase.
"The Senate over the past few years has been the lowest common denominator. We'll take what we can get," he said.
DeLay said he hoped Congress this year would at least pass an extension of the full $1,000 child tax credit, so-called marriage penalty relief and expansion of the 10 percent tax bracket. He said Republicans would "live to fight another day" and would try to make tax cuts permanent after the November elections.
COMMENTS
- Why does DeLay want to subsidize children? We have enough of them and families that have many generally cannot afford them - that is no reason for us to pay for them to have kids! The $1000 child credit is an area that the government should stay away from. Tax policy should not favor having kids! If the political pressure is to favor kids then the credit should be limited to two kids with the first getting the $1000 credit and the second getting a $500 credit and nothing after two kids! Also, I would propose that the credit not be given for having children but be given for payment of school tuition with the $1000 credit for the first child and $500 for the second and nothing thereafter. If the people cannot afford a large family - they shouldn't have one! There is no reason for tax policy to subsidize large families! GovExec.com reader Posted March 10, 2004 6:56 AM









