TOPICS

President Barack Obama proposed a 2 percent pay increase for civilian workers and a 2.9 percent pay hike for military personnel in fiscal 2010, according to a budget outline released on Thursday.

"As families are tightening their belts in this economic crisis across the country, the president ordered a freeze of White House senior staff pay," the budget stated. "In this budget, federal employees also will be asked to do their part ... bringing federal pay and benefit practices more in line with the private sector."

On the military side, however, Obama proposed increasing pay by nearly 1 percent more in an effort, the document said, to reflect "the priorities of an administration that is committed to caring for the service members who protect our security and the families who support them."


RELATED STORIES

A 2004 law mandates that military pay raises be equal to the change in the Labor Department's annual Employment Cost Index for the private sector's wages. From September 2007 to September 2008, the change in the ECI was 2.9 percent.

While there is no law that federal civilian pay equal the change in the ECI, the president typically is urged by members of Congress to give both groups the same raise. The absence of pay parity in the budget proposal is similar to 2008, when Bush proposed a 2.9 percent pay increase for civilian workers and a 3.4 percent boost for military personnel.

Last year, Congress ignored President Bush's recommendations, however, and granted both groups a pay raise of 3.9 percent.

Federal labor union officials had a mixed reaction to the budget announcement Thursday.

"Even in this economy, 2 percent is a very small increase for workers that are already paid well below those doing similar work in the private sector," said Richard Brown, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees. "We will be asking Congress for a bigger raise than 2 percent."

Likewise, the National Treasury Employees Union was critical of the proposal. "We understand that these are tough times, but we are very concerned about breaking the historic linkage of civilian and military pay parity," said NTEU President Colleen M. Kelley. "We want to find out why these pay raise numbers came out the way they did, and what went into the analysis regarding pay parity. We also want to know what other proposals the administration will be pursuing this year that will affect federal workers."

But Jacque Simon, public policy director of the American Federation of Government Employees, said that while the 2 percent figure represents a modest increase for federal employees, the union understands the need for cuts this year. "We recognize the severity of the economic situation, so we're viewing the pay raise in that context," she said.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., pledged to push for equal military and civilian raises. "While it's to be expected that during this time of shared sacrifice there will not likely be a federal employee adjustment equal to last year's level, we must continue to adhere to the long-standing bipartisan principle of pay parity," he said in a statement. "This is just the beginning of the process, and I intend to work with President Obama to ensure a fair and equal adjustment for both our military and civilian personnel who work side-by-side to protect our nation and keep our government running."

Locality pay will account for a portion of the 2 percent hike.

COMMENTS

  • "Postal workers are included in the 2% raise.DUH. That system is a blood sucking,long fanged monster" --Richard C. One tiny problem exists with this statement, Richard. Postal Service labor employees do not get this %2 raise because we have a separate contract with the US Postal Service and COLA's are worked in, for instance, due to the stagnant economy, our most current scheduled COLA is 0.0%. Other facts that you are no doubt ignorant of: Congress controls most of the major actions the USPS takes, such as postal rates and days of operation. Congress can and has (ie 2007 fiscal year) mandated that the USPS break even at best... no profit allowed. The USPS was excoriated for the profits it made in the late 1990's and early 2000's when mail volume was at an insanely high level and a great deal of less than informed people still thought that there taxes paid for the postal service. The last year that the postal service (read postal PATRONS) received subsidies from the government was 1982. They are currently being loaned money from the Treasury, as are GM, Chrysler and many financial institutions. When it is clear that these loans would be forgiven, then and only then can one say that the USPS received taxpayer subsidies to provide services at less than cost for.... those same taxpayers. Unfair? Yes. Thoses costs should be paid solely and proportionally by those who avail themselves of that service. The US postal service is made by congress to provide welfare to business, such as leasing vehicles from companies such as Chrysler. I do not have access to those contracts (I am speculating on this point), but they are most likely similar to the Bush administration's handout to airplane manufacturers after 9/11 in that the leases were much more expensive than actually buying the planes. By law, the USPS cannot own its own airplanes, at the behest of firms like Fed-Ex and UPS. USPS must pay commercial airlines to ship mail. The USPS has rates so low, that it and has been more profitable at times for firms such as UPS, Airborne Express and DHL to pay the USPS retail rates to deliver those for them. Cost for a standard sized letter up to 1 oz to be delivered by the USPS: 44 cents. Price via UPS: from $10.50 up to $25.00 (2nd day air rates...equivalent to USPS first class mail.) Price via FedEx: $17.52.
  • Postal workers are included in the 2% raise.DUH. That system is a blood sucking,long fanged monster.Lets trash it and go to carrier pigeons service.We have a huge flock of them here in Cheyenne.They work for chicken feed.
  • Boy, that is some lousy hope and change. He extends uemployment, dithers and then will screw troops who keep us safe. What a swell guy we have if you are minority or unemployed. Those of us with increased cost daily are getting screwed by democrat Pres.