GovernmentExecutive.com

The multibillion dollar effort to secure part of the Southwestern border with physical and virtual fencing was praised by an administration official Tuesday as a vital step in protecting the nation from terrorists, but criticized by two House Appropriations panel members as a wasteful effort to stop illegal immigrants looking for work.

With the occasionally heated focus on the Bush administration's ambitious Secure Border Initiative, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Ralph Basham never got a chance to discuss most of his agency's $10.2 billion fiscal 2008 budget request. Basham and Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar had to deal with skeptical questions from Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman David Price, D-N.C., and more pointed challenges from Reps. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., and Sam Farr, D-Calif.

Price asked repeatedly for detailed explanations of how much of the nearly 2,000 mile border with Mexico was to be protected by fencing to stop individuals, or auto barriers and sensors. And he wondered if the $2.5 billion that would be spent by the end of fiscal 2008 was the best use of taxpayers' money.

"At the end of the day, our goal must be to control who enters our country and our means to achieve that goal must be what works," Price said.

Basham and his deputies gave Price a breakdown of the expected coverage of a tall "anti-pedestrian" fence, vehicle barriers and virtual fencing.

"The bottom line, about 970 miles we will have effective control of by the end of fiscal 2008," Aquilar said.

Basham said the initiative would help the agency "keep terrorists and terrorists' weapons from entering the United States."

But Serrano noted that the agency could not cite a single terrorist or weapon apprehended at the Southwestern border, while the 19 terrorists who hijacked the airliners used in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and other would-be terrorists came across the Canadian border, which would receive no additional protection under SBI. And Farr said none of the local government officials he has talked to along the border support the fence.

Basham said additional security was going to the Northern border and noted that the administration does support a guest worker program. Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee ranking member Harold Rogers, R-Ky., expressed support for the SBI program but noted that the subcommittee's effort when he was chairman had improved.

Almost overlooked in the debate over the fencing issue, Richard Stana, director of Homeland Security and Justice issue for the Government Accountability Office, said the agency's contact with Boeing to integrate the complex SBI program still lacked specifics on quantity of the work and said it had to be modified to conform to federal contracting rules.

Basham disagreed, arguing that the contract did specify what Boeing was to produce.

COMMENTS

• The Millenium bomber entered the U.S. from Canada, and was caught at the border thanks to U.S. Customs inspectors. Unfortunately, Canada's immigration policies are even worse than ours, and like us, they don't even know who is in their country! GovExec.com reader Posted April 27, 2007 11:14 AM
• None of the Sept. 11 hijackers entered from Canada! Please check your facts! Serrano needs to check his as well. Marianne Rude Posted March 7, 2007 12:27 AM
• Rep. Serrano says that DHS hasn't caught a single terrorist crossing the border from Mexico into the U.S. That could either mean that terrorists successfully cross the border with Mexico without interference from the Border Patrol, or it could mean they don't come that way at all, in which case the Border Patrol is a successful deterrent. What about the narcotics smugglers and other criminals who cross the border? Aren't they also "terrorists" in a manner of speaking? Even if there aren't any terrorists being caught there, it doesn't mean that we don't need CBP there to address the huge problems of narcotics smuggling and illegal immigration. What would Rep. Serrano have us do, pull out from the border like he wants our troops to pull out of Iraq? The reality of the situation is that DHS has little or nothing to do with fighting terror, because its hands have been tied since its inception four years ago. The FBI is the only U.S. law enforcement agency authorized to investigate terrorism, and jealously guards its authority. Remember what happened to the U.S. Customs Service's Operation Green Quest, which pursued terrorist financing investigations? The FBI pressured DHS, and not only forced ICE (which combined INS and Customs agents) to give up lead agency status in these investigations to the FBI, but also forced ICE to stop even using the name Operation Green Quest! The FBI also vetoed a proposal to change the name of ICE from Immigration and Customs Enforcement to Investigations and Criminal Enforcement, because after all, there is only one federal agency with the word "Investigation" in its title. Can you guess who? The FBI doesn't want anyone else to play in its sandbox. That's one of the reasons morale at DHS is abysmal, but there are many others as well. DHS has been a huge and expensive mistake, and no one is willing to admit that, much less take the steps that are necessary to make it better GovExec.com reader Posted March 2, 2007 5:13 PM