TOPICS
TOPICS
Panel weighs bill to deny corrupt public servants federal pensions
House Government Reform Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va., will add his voice Wednesday to the cacophony of lawmakers pushing for more stringent ethics laws in the wake of recent scandals.
Davis plans to introduce a narrowly tailored ethics overhaul measure denying retirement benefits to federal policymakers -- including members of Congress -- who engage in public corruption.
It is still unclear whether Davis' proposal, which the panel is examining in a hearing, will become part of a broader ethics package to be introduced by Rules Chairman David Dreier, R-Calif., or put forward as a stand-alone measure, a spokesman for Davis said.
The legislation would apply to any crime punishable by more than one year imprisonment, including accepting bribes, conspiracy, fraud and falsifying statements or documents. The bill is "clearly a no-brainer," Davis' spokesman said.
Government Reform ranking member Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said he was "pleased that Chairman Davis is holding a hearing concerning the ethics in the federal government. The recent scandals involving Jack Abramoff and others have underscored the need for a comprehensive review of how well our ethics laws and regulations are working."
Chellie Pingree, president of Common Cause, who is scheduled to testify Wednesday on Davis' bill, praised the legislation, but recommended further changes in ethics enforcement.
Pingree noted that pensions for members of Congress and top federal employees are often higher than the average annual salary for most Americans. "The fact that public servants who have seriously violated their duties to the public would be rewarded by a lifetime pension seems grossly unfair," Pingree said in a statement.
She said she would also testify about the need for an independent commission, rather than the Ethics committees, to investigate complaints against members suspected of breaking the rules. "Peer review simply is not the answer when it comes to a fair, firm process that ensures that members live by ethics rules on the books," she said.
The commission, which would report its findings to the House and Senate Ethics committees, would be comprised of five members selected by party leaders in both chambers, a spokeswoman for Common Cause said.
She recommended that the panel be made up of retired judges to avoid criticism that members might be beholden to the lawmakers who appointed them, a charge sometimes leveled against the FEC, whose members are also selected by chamber leaders.
The spokeswoman said that, so far, none of the ethics proposals put forth by members of Congress have adopted the suggestion, although Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid's, D-Nev., bill would establish an Office of Public Integrity.
COMMENTS
- Organized crime is alive and well, Bill Gates is as bad as Lockheed Martin. Careers will be destroyed if you don't buy MS products. Al Capone would so proud. Fred Hammerstine Posted October 13, 2007 9:26 PM
- If you don't think the American people could be that dumb, explain why Bush and his fascists got another four years to wreak havoc on this nation and the world? How, after all the illegal, immoral and disgusting crimes they've committed, do they still go unpunished? Believe me -- the American people can be very dumb. You can see by Congress' "reform" to continue receiving trips from lobbyists that they aren't really serious about ethics. GovExec.com reader Posted March 31, 2006 6:53 AM
- If they cannot be honest they need to lose their retirement pensions. A good example is Enron, how many workers lost their retirement because of the greed of the CEOs? How did Enron gouge California in the energy fiasco? How did Exxon gouge the public after Hurricane Katrina? Exxon’s answer: We didn’t gouge the public we are working smarter. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know Exxon lied and covered it with fancy math and smart lawyers. The more money the dishonest have the better lawyers they hire and deny all wrong doing! How many dishonest people built mansions in Florida and claimed bankruptcy, yet live like Kings in Florida? Why should convicted CEO or other wealthy persons have an exclusive prison? Let them go to the same prisons as all other criminals. President Clinton lied to the world about his affair with Monica, was impeached, and allowed to stay in office to grant presidential pardons to some nefarious people! It will be years before that damage to our country will be corrected if ever! How else could Hillary Clinton get elected in an area that she did not represent or live? I don’t think the American public is that dumb! There are people who do not like Bill Gates of Microsoft, but Bill Gates has improved our country with computers and continues to give back to society. Can as much be said for other CEOs? Can as much be said for Donald Trump? Did Martha Stewart do anything any other financier has not done? GovExec.com reader Posted March 29, 2006 11:39 AM









