TOPICS
TOPICS
Lieberman says enactment of DHS authorization bill a priority
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., Tuesday outlined his panel's priorities for the year, including the first authorization bill for the Homeland Security Department. Lieberman indicated he would like his committee to mark up the authorization bill before congressional appropriators approve the department's annual spending bill.
That would put the time frame during the summer, as the Homeland Security spending bill is usually one of the first to pass Congress.
"I want us to begin to do a Department of Homeland Security authorization bill in much the way that the Armed Services Committee does an annual Department of Defense authorization bill as a way for this committee ... to reach some conclusions about both the resource needs of the department before the appropriators appropriate and also about policy changes that may make sense for the department," Lieberman said after a private meeting with Arizona Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano, who is President-elect Obama's choice to lead the Homeland Security Department.
The department was created nearly six years ago but has never had an authorization bill, mainly because the Senate has never completed work on one.
Lieberman said he informed Napolitano of his committee's priorities during his meeting. "I think she's a superb nominee for a critically important department and, in the normal course of things, I look forward to supporting the nomination barring any unexpected events," Lieberman said.
Napolitano appears to be smoothly heading toward confirmation; no senators have publicly said they oppose her nomination. Lieberman said he would like to see the Senate vote on her nomination by Jan. 21 but noted the timing is up to Senate Democratic leaders. Lieberman said other priorities for his committee include strengthening efforts to prevent a terrorist attack in the country using weapons of mass destruction, improving rail and public transit security, reauthorizing chemical security legislation and addressing cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
"The fact is that, because of the new technological realities of our world, the U.S. government [and] U.S. industry are under constant and pervasive cyberattack," he said. "I want our committee to focus on how we're organizing that defense and what the role of the Department of Homeland Security should be in that." Lieberman said he also firmly believes the Federal Emergency Management Agency should be kept within the department.
He said Napolitano has not reached a decision on the matter and needs to consult with Obama. "I feel that no parts of DHS should be jettisoned," Lieberman said.
He added that Napolitano will "take a very fresh look at border security and immigration enforcement generally," including controversial work site raids carried out by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "I think it's fair to say that ... she's a law enforcer," Lieberman said, noting Napolitano's background as a U.S. attorney. "I think that while one can ask questions about the way in which the raids are being carried out, if the law says that employers should not employ illegal immigrants, I think you can expect this secretary -- Secretary[-designate] Napolitano -- to do whatever she can to see that that law is enforced."
COMMENTS
- 9/11 happened because our intelligence agencies failed not our border agencies. When DHS was created, almost all countries followed suit with the exception of Australia. They created a DHS like department but without agencies. Should we do the same? we're in an unprecedented recession. DHS is the 2nd largest dept in the US govt. Just abolish DHS, it does not work. Instead, overhaul the intelligence agencies. we owe it to the people. Jesus Rodriguez Posted February 7, 2009 10:14 AM
- ICE and CBP: "Jacks of all trades, masters of none"! Both "Don" and "Jim K198" are right on target, and make very good points. However, since it is unlikely that ICE and CBP will be reorganized along the lines of the former legacy U.S. Customs Service and INS (much as I would love to see that happen), the next best thing to do would be to merge them into one law enforcement agency. There is no reason why the uniformed officers (CBP) and the detectives (ICE) should be in separate agencies. This flies in the face of common sense, and isn't done at any other major law enforcement agency. I also think that the FBI was behind this, because it didn't want any competition from DHS to threaten it's position as America's most powerful law enforcement agency! Remember that Michael Chertoff came from the Justice Department, while Michael Garcia and his chief of staff not only also came from DOJ, but were married to FBI agents. Coincidence? I think not! ICEd Posted January 20, 2009 12:41 PM
- I agree with the need to change the organizational structure at the border and Immigration policy. I do not agree with merging ICE and CBP. Take both of these agencies apart and reorganize them into two new agencies, each with distinct responsibilities. Create one agency for currency, drug and commercial trade enforcement, return to the legacy Customs. The other, an immigration enforcement agency. The Immigration enforcement agency would be comprised of the Deportation division from ICE and the Immigration Officers and Border Patrol Agents from CBP. If anything was proven with this great experiment, having an agency enforce two sections of the United States Code does not work. We need agencies that can focus. We do not need “subject matter experts”; we need “experts on the subject”. Government surveys reveal very low moral at both ICE (OI) Office of Investigations and at Customs and Border Protection. Let us correct two small problems, not create one bigger problem. Don Posted January 13, 2009 7:32 PM









