Homeland Security drops proposed labor relations plans
The Homeland Security Department is dropping its plans to revise the proposed labor relations rules of its new personnel system, at least for now.
Thursday marked a deadline for DHS to file a status report with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia detailing its plans to either revise or abandon proposed labor relations rules under its Human Capital Operational Plan. The rules were enjoined by an appeals court in June 2006.
"We can't do anything," a DHS official said Wednesday. "Even if we wanted to move forward, we don't have the money to do it."
A fiscal 2008 omnibus spending bill signed into law in December 2007 provides zero funding for DHS' personnel plan, essentially barring the department from implementing key elements of the system, including labor relations. The bill grants the agency $10 million to turn around the results of a 2006 federal workforce survey, which rated the department at or near the bottom in leadership, performance management and job satisfaction.
The lack of funding for HCOP is largely a result of criticism from lawmakers and federal labor unions that the personnel plan was a major contributor to plummeting employee morale.
The status report filed in the court Thursday indicates that DHS and the Office of Personnel Management "have made no decision as to whether to revise or abandon these regulations." The filing referenced language in the omnibus bill that limited funds for the system or any subsequent system until pending litigation is resolved.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down the labor relations program in June 2006, ruling that it would illegally curtail collective bargaining rights for employees by giving management the ability to cancel negotiated agreements after the fact. The ruling unanimously upheld and even broadened the district court's decision to strike down large parts of the personnel plan.
The decision to scrap the rules marks another victory for federal labor unions, which have long called on Homeland Security to scrap the personnel plan and place collective bargaining back under general federal labor law.
"Congress gave DHS authority to revise the personnel system while retaining employee rights, but DHS overstepped that authority by trampling on employee rights," said Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union. "The courts agreed with NTEU that DHS' plan was illegal."
Kelley added that DHS also must drop its efforts to impose on employees any aspects of the personnel plan, including regulations concerning due process and appeal rights and pay for performance. While the courts did not rule the adverse actions and appeals portions of the system illegal, the lower court rebuked them.
Rather than moving forward with HCOP, Kelley said, DHS should focus on addressing the serious morale problems affecting its mission. Fixing these problems, which means respecting employees and showing a greater willingness to work with employee representatives, should be the department's priority, she said.
COMMENTS
- Ketter, the fact that you said "Customs only function was to harass US citizens" shows just how ignorant you are on this issue, and how little credibility you have. Anyone who makes a stupid comment like that obviously has nothing worthwhile to add to this discussion, which I've noticed is true of most of your anti-Federal employee postings on Gov Exec. You have freedom to speak thanks to our Constitution, but that doesn't mean anyone has to pay any attention at all to the nonsense that comes out of your mouth! ICE-bound Posted January 25, 2008 11:46 AM
- I have been retired for about 7 months now, and see that nothing has changed regarding the morale and leadership at DHS/ICE, what a shame I thought it would get better once I left being legacy INS it was one more out of thier way, to all my partners on the job or retired, there is light at the end of the tunnel it's called Goverment contracting, put those skills to work for a contractor that does care,pays better, and at the same time still serves the country and the american people. J.M. Posted January 25, 2008 1:50 AM
- The other problem is that with all the good people jumping ship the employees that don't know what they are doing will get promoted because there isn't anyone to compete against. I've seen it before. An agency give a bad employee a rave review to get rid of them and at the new agency everyone is jumping ship so the inept get promoted then good employees come back in when the dust has settled and they complain because of their manager. It's how boot lickers survive and thrive. LJ Posted January 23, 2008 12:16 PM
RELATED STORIES
- Catch-all funding bill includes pay parity, personnel provisions 12/18/07
- Personnel chiefs grapple with workforce planning, pay systems 09/26/07
- Court extends deadline for DHS decision on labor rules 07/18/07
- Unions seek full court review of Defense personnel ruling 07/03/07
- OPM pushes Homeland Security to move on pay for performance 05/25/07









