TOPICS
TOPICS
China's largely inactive submarine fleet stirs
China's entire fleet of 55 attack submarines conducted six patrols in 2007, up from the two the fleet conducted in 2006 and none in 2005, according to new information obtained by a scientific organization.
The information was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and posted on the Federation of American Scientists Strategic Security blog. According to the Navy, none of China's ballistic missile submarines have ever made a patrol, 25 years after the country's first nuclear missile capable submarine was built. Chinese submarines in the 1990s conducted an average of 1.2 patrols a year. FAS said the U.S. Navy's submarine fleet conducts more than 100 patrols annually.
The Navy has been faulted in some quarters for paying insufficient attention to China's growing maritime power, much of which rests on new submarines. At a House Armed Services Committee hearing Dec. 13, 2007, ranking Republican Duncan Hunter of California said the U.S. Navy risks being eclipsed by China's growing maritime power.
In an exchange with Navy chief Adm. Gary Roughead, Hunter said China was "outstripping us by 3-1 on submarine production, and your own figures show that they are going to eclipse us in submarine numbers in 2011." In response, Roughead said anti-submarine warfare was a top Navy priority.
While the Chinese submarine inventory includes a number of older diesel electric boats, the country recently took delivery of eight Russian-built Kilo class, non-nuclear powered submarines, according to the Congressional Research Service. China is building four classes of new submarines including a nuclear powered attack submarine and a nuclear powered ballistic missile submarine, and was expected to have 28 relatively modern submarines in its inventory by 2006.
Yet, China's low submarine patrol numbers would appear to call into question the level of training of its submarine crews and the capability of the its submarine fleet to operate much beyond the nation's coastal waters.
The U.S. Navy currently operates 53 nuclear-powered attack submarines, twice as many as the rest of the world combined, and is building its newest attack submarine -- the nuclear-powered Virginia class -- at the rate of one per year. The service also maintains a fleet of anti-submarine warfare aircraft that has no equal.
The Navy's annual funding of $137 billion dwarfs China's entire defense budget, which was estimated at $44 billion in 2006, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
In an analysis of relative global naval power, Robert O. Work, senior defense analyst at the Center for Strategic Budgetary Assessments in Washington, wrote, "No naval challenger now threatens the U.S. Navy... Although the battle fleet numbers fewer ships that at any time since 1931, the Navy likely enjoys a wider margin of superiority than at any point since the late 1940s."
The Navy's 71 major surface warships have a cumulative guided missile magazine capacity greater than that of the 366 major surface combatants in the next 17 largest navies, Work said. The U.S. Navy also owns 12 of the world's 15 aircraft carriers and operates its own air arm that is larger than any other nation's air force.
COMMENTS
- It is no secret that China has a weak navy and no nuclear powered submarines. The Xia and Jin class submarines do not exist. Recently Russia knocked out a Communist Chinese ship and the Chinese ran. Prof. Yang Posted July 29, 2009 4:32 PM
- Am I missing something, or are the other posters who responded to this article? I read that the Chinese have 55 attack submarines, while we have 53 missile subs. I also read that the Chinese are outbuilding us in subs by 3 to 1. The fact that the Chinese subs are characterized as "attack" subs leads me to wonder who they are planning to attack, and the only logical answer is the U.S. Navy, their only perceived threat. That alone should give our leaders pause, and make them take this matter seriously. And to those who scoff at the threat posed by the Chinese military, wasn't it only recently that a Chinese submarine shadowed a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier in the Pacific, without us knowing about it? Still feel that there is no threat from China? Bob Posted January 29, 2008 2:36 PM
- "Now can we finally stop taking about the China threat and leave China alone?" That would be a big mistake. Know your enemy is more important today then it ever was. China is starting to get to know us (USA) pretty darn good - to good. If Hillary does make it to the White House China will know us even better. RcC Posted January 27, 2008 2:00 AM









