TOPICS

TSA pushes ahead on port worker credentials project

The Transportation Security Administration earlier this week formally announced the award of a contract worth at least $70 million to contractor Lockheed Martin Corp. to produce biometric identification cards at ports.

The agreement to produce cards under TSA's Transportation Worker Identity Credentials program is known as an indefinite delivery-indefinite quantity contract; its value may eventually exceed $70 million. That figure covers the five years of Lockheed's contract, said TSA spokesman Darrin Kayser. The agency will have the option to renew the contract at that point.

Kayser said Lockheed will produce up to 850,000 cards, which will be more than is needed to supply the 750,000 current port workers. The additional cards were included in the contract to cover new hires and turnover at ports, he said.


RELATED STORIES

"Ensuring identities of individuals who have access to secure areas is vital to port security," Kayser said.

But labor union officials criticized TSA's plan.

"They're not producing enough TWIC cards," said International Brotherhood of Teamsters spokesman Galen Munroe, arguing that anticipating a turnover of 100,000 ports jobs is insufficient. He pointed to industry figures suggesting attrition is as high as 130 percent annually in some parts of the ports industry.

Every port worker who has unescorted access to secure areas will have to provide biometric and biographical information -- some as soon as March 26, when TSA initiates the enrollment phase of the project. Information supplied will be cross-screened against databases housing immigration, criminal and intelligence information before workers are approved for TWIC cards.

Kayser said the enrollment process will continue over the next 15 months, until workers at every major U.S. port have supplied biometric information.

TSA published its final rules on implementation of the credentials program earlier this month, prompting criticism from union officials.

Port workers who must buy the cards should not be subject to a wait of a year or longer while owners and operators buy and install credentialing equipment, opponents have argued. They also said the program would impose excessive costs on workers. According to initial estimates, workers were expected to pay nearly $160 for cards that would be valid for five years.

TSA has not set a deadline for installation of card readers, Kayser said. But he said the projected cost of the cards has dropped to about $137 per worker under the Lockheed contract. Those who have already completed comparable background checks will be able to seek a discounted fee of $105, he said. Comparable checks include ones necessary to meet requirements to drive commercial hazardous materials or obtain merchant mariner documents or Free and Secure Trade credentials.

Along with the lower-than-expected price tag, TSA and Lockheed are trying to accommodate workers' needs by putting the contractor-run enrollment sites as close as possible to ports, Kayser said. Munroe said the $137 price tag per card cards is still too high for port workers and their families to cover themselves.

COMMENTS

  • Isn't this pretty much the same thing as the highly touted common access card (CAC) which still has a very limited functionality and a high overhead. The CAC with its biometrics and PKI was supposed to be the epitome of all DoD ID cards. It is somewhat useful for encrypting email and for gaining access to some websites, but the Air Force doesn't recognize those issued by the DON and there are few places that have readers for general use. Used properly the CAC card could provide positive ID for many thousand military and DoD civilian and contractor personnel. All that would be necessary is a $38 card reader, read only data base access and a little intelligence and a lot less "knee jerk" reaction in TSA and Congress.
  • Why the TSA? Don't they have enough on their plate with air travel, trains, and hot air balloons? Where is the vaunted CBP, the famous "one face at the border"? Wake up America, we're still losing!
  • Why is it always the big defense companies like Lockheed Martin that win these contracts? They are not in the ID business.