TOPICS

A Senate foreign relations panel took a hard line on Iraq reconstruction spending Thursday, demanding that the State Department show an improved return on its investments or risk losing project funds.

"I am not inclined to support any additional funding in this area without strong assurances that this sort of mismanagement has been weeded out," freshman Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., told Ambassador David Satterfield, State's senior adviser on Iraq, at a hearing.

Webb cited idle contractors and overhead costs reaching more than half of total project costs, fraud and abuse investigations pending before inspectors general, and "blunders" by the State and Defense departments.


RELATED STORIES

Satterfield testified that new reconstruction funding is slated to support, among other things, a jump in the number of provincial reconstruction teams in Iraq from the current 10 to 20, with nine of the new teams working in Baghdad and the northwestern Anbar province that the administration says has become a haven for Al Qaeda terrorists. As President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced two weeks ago, the teams are intended to work on the kinds of local projects that can win the "hearts and minds" of Iraqi citizens.

In a strained exchange, Webb questioned Satterfield closely on how the administration will fulfill a pledge to work with Iraqi leaders of all parties and affiliations who "reject violence and pursue their agendas through peaceful, democratic means."

Webb said ongoing problems with poor-quality intelligence on the ground and a "fairly vague standard" for what constitutes peaceful means would allow the administration latitude in deciding which Iraqi leaders to work with.

Satterfield responded that State has "crisp" standards to measure whether a group operates peacefully. "The purpose of the expansion of the provincial reconstruction teams, [and] the additional pairing with the brigade commanders, is to enhance our abilities at a finer and finer level" to develop good information on the ground, he said.

"I think it's very clear who's engaged in violence," Satterfield said, promising to provide Webb with a copy of State's "measurable standards."

Satterfield testified that 300 new people would be added in the 10-team expansion. Their expertise will support projects including microloans, vocational education, grants, new business development, job creation and capacity-building in the first wave of expansion, with two later phases to add technical personnel such as irrigation specialists, agribusiness experts and veterinarians, he said.

COMMENTS

  • All flow of U.S.A. money to Iraq should be stopped until the country is at peace. This will not happen because it could deprive the President’s and VP's friends of money. Why would anyone in their right mind try to rebuild a country during a war? We didn't rebuild Europe until the war ended and then we didn't rebuild anything in the Russian zones. We didn't try to rebuild VN during the war. The Union didn't rebuild the Confederacy until after the war. The U.S.A. should not be rebuilding countries until we know who wins the wars! America has not won a war since WWII and should stop all rebuilding until there is peace. This country shouldn't be rewarding those at war but should spend our money on those at peace. We should support peace, not war!
  • The story states: "As President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced two weeks ago, the teams are intended to work on the kinds of local projects that can win the ‘hearts and minds’ of Iraqi citizens." The only thing on the "hearts and minds of Iraqi citizens" is killing one another, depending on their religious persuasion. Spending more U.S. tax dollars on rebuilding in Iraq, until the Iraqis have learned to live together peacefully, is to flush money down the drain, and place an undue burden on our children and our children’s children. The only teams that should be placed into Iraq now or in the future should be highly armed military teams that are dispatched to cordon off and guard the oil fields and pipelines, and when sufficient amounts of oil have been pumped out which offset the current costs of this boondoggle of King George's war the he has involved us in, we should then withdraw to the borders and let the Sunnis and Shiites go at one another until a winner emerges. That won't happen -- but it should!