TOPICS

Amtrak supporters have revived legislation that would provide full funding -- $19.2 billion -- for the railroad over the next six years and create a matching-fund program to encourage states to increase their financial stakes in the system.

Under the $1.4 billion matching program, states could tap federal funds to finance up to 80 percent of the costs for Amtrak capital improvement projects. The bill would also establish standards for the agreements under which states pay operating costs for Amtrak lines. The deals are negotiated on a case-by-case basis.

The bill's sponsor, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said Tuesday that Amtrak was needed more then ever.


RELATED STORIES

"Our bill would allow people to get out of the security lines and delays in the aviation system," he said at a news conference with Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott, R-Miss., at Washington's Union Station.

A similar bill passed the Senate 93-6 in 2005 only to be blocked in the House. Backers say it has a better chance of success in the new Democratic-controlled Congress.

"It should have been a piece of cake" in the last Congress, Lott said.

National Railroad Passenger Association spokesman Ross Capon said in an interview that he believed "we now have a leadership [in the House] that will bring this to the floor and get it passed."

Amtrak CEO Alexander Kummant appeared at the Union Station event to pledge his cooperation with Lautenberg and Lott but did not endorse the legislation.

The bill calls for Amtrak to develop a plan to overhaul facilities and upgrade security while cutting operating costs 40 percent.

Lautenberg said he would "leave it up to Amtrak's management to find places" to cut. Lott suggested that some of the reductions might be achieved by eliminating sparsely used long-distance lines.

Kummant said such a reduction was "achievable" but declined to discuss the "details." He later said in an interview that not all long-distance lines were under-used, but added: "Do I think some adjustments need to be made? Yes. Do I think the status quo is acceptable? No."

The bill would also require standards to make trains run on time and improve service. As a part of the initiative, Amtrak would have the power to fine freight railroads that cause delays on Amtrak routes.

Led by California and Illinois, a number of states subsidize Amtrak service extensively. California spends $73 million a year on Amtrak lines.

Illinois last year doubled its annual investment to $24 million. The subsidies allowed Amtrak to offer more frequent service on high-demand routes between Chicago and St. Louis, Carbondale, Ill., and Quincy, Ill.

COMMENTS

  • As long as Amtrak plays second fiddle to Freight, delays and poor service will be common. Does Southern Pacific consider Amtrak trains an evil they must tolerate? My wife and I arrived 22 1/2 hours late into New Orleans from Los Angeles on the Sunset Limited #2 on Sat. 19 May instead of Friday 18 May 2007, losing one night's prepaid non refundable hotel and ruining our 2-day vacation plans to see N.O. before taking another Amtrak to Atlanta on 20 May. However, that train arrived Atlanta "on-time" just 20 minutes late. So much for a different way to travel across country! Other people missed connections, graduations, weddings and funerals due to delay. We were just on vacation!
  • Who needs Amtrak? Only the few people who want to "see America first" by rail. It's common knowledge that this bankrupt railroad serves no known mass transit or security need. If people are afraid to fly, let them drive!
  • National public mass transit debates? What a strange and bizarre concept! I am always perplexed that in the Senate, energy, global warming and green transportation debates the larger concept of, "public, mass Intermodal Passenger Transportation" is never mentioned. As you can see on the Department of Transportation's website there is no mention of the strange concept unless it seems to apply to freight (i.e. private profit). Maybe it is political suicide to mention Public Intermodal Passenger Transit, especially after the Hurricane Katrina evacuation fiasco and the FEMA failures to mobilize and plan for transportation alternatives for those without automobiles. As a nation, we may have money to budget to go to Mars but not to go easily and economically by rail from one region to another of the nation. Is there sometihing wrong with this picture?