TOPICS
TOPICS
Homeland Security nominee seeks to bring allies to department
Looking to tame a young department that the White House sees as an unruly teenager, President Bush has tapped 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Michael Chertoff to be the stern father at the Homeland Security Department.
But if he's confirmed as secretary, Chertoff's disciplinary options will be limited, unless he can recruit reliable allies to the department.
Shortly after being nominated, Chertoff inquired about how much influence he'd have over filling vacancies. Departing Secretary Tom Ridge had little voice in the selection of his own subordinates. And for Chertoff, the early signals from the White House have not been encouraging, according to sources close to him.
Beginning with the Reagan administration, secretaries' control over the appointments of their deputies and undersecretaries has declined precipitously, observes Paul Light, a New York University professor who has studied the presidential appointments process. He says among the current secretaries, the only two who've had much of a say are Donald Rumsfeld at Defense and Colin Powell, who is leaving the State Department.
In lower-ranking posts, Chertoff has found ways to pull in his own people. Soon after taking over the Justice Department's Criminal Division in May 2001, he fired half of the division's section chiefs. "People respect him enough and respect his judgment so that if he says, 'This is who I need,' he can make it happen," says one former colleague.
And Chertoff has a well-placed ally. Julie Myers, a former Chertoff chief of staff, is now working in the White House personnel office on the staffing of the Homeland Security and Justice departments. And there are enough vacancies in the top ranks of Homeland Security that Chertoff can quickly put his own imprint on the department, if the White House will let him.
Three senior posts -- those in charge of departmental security, cyber-security, and infrastructure protection -- are already open. And Undersecretary for Border and Transportation Security Asa Hutchinson and Assistant Secretary for Information Analysis Patrick Hughes are rumored to be plotting exit strategies.
"It's an opportunity to get a management team around the secretary that collectively has all the qualities that we need for the leadership of the department," says former department Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin.
Chertoff has a bipartisan bench of allies to draw on, from his time as GOP special counsel for the Whitewater investigation; as a partner at the law firm of Latham & Watkins; and at Justice. Colleagues say he'd like to recruit the following:
People familiar with the complicated inner workings of Homeland Security say Chertoff must make his mark within 90 days, or he won't make one. Where his closest allies end up will be a real indicator of whether Chertoff is likely to succeed.
COMMENTS
- A plea to the Nominee: Mr. Chertoff, abolish the useless BTS directorate, abolish ICE, and send the Office of Investigation (legacy Customs & Legacy INS investigations) back to CBP where we rightfully belong. Send the Air Marshals back to TSA to fulfill their Transportation Security mission. Send the FPS to the Secret Service who can better use them and incorporate them into its primary mission of protection. Allow Legacy Customs Office of Investigations get back to successfully conducting long-term complex investigations and please get our lost turf back from the over budgeted and under performing FBI. To accomplish this Mr. Chertoff, you must not cede any more DHS jurisdiction and responsibility to DOJ. You yourself are no longer with DOJ and your absolute loyalty must now be with the men and women of DHS and our mission of securing the Homeland. Don't try to make us a divison within the DOJ. Fight for us and we will fight for you! We are desperate for leadership and direction in ICE and DHS overall, please don't let us down Mr. Nominee! GovExec.com reader Posted January 25, 2005 10:01 AM
- Oh great, that's all we need is more attorneys running things!! Haven't the current attorneys screwed up DHS enough? Chertoff needs to hire more people with back bones that are law enforcement directed rather than gutless, spineless attorneys that turn tail and give away the barn [or country] at the drop of the hat or whining, sniveling congressman. Hutchinson and Garcia have done NOTHING to improve the agency. GovExec.com reader Posted January 22, 2005 1:09 AM
- What is it with the fascination about attorneys and their ability to lead an organization like DHS? Every one of Michael Chertoff's so-called "dream team" happens to be an attorney. What about leaders with extensive real-world experience and significant academic training in management like the kind found in most MBA and MPA programs? The last time I checked law schools offer very little, if any at all, training on actual managerial or leadership topics that would be beneficial to someone taking over a supervisory/leadership position at DHS. Most lawyers are pretty good at handling legal matters, but it may be time to bring in people with extensive leadership experience and fresh ideas who are skilled at managing large-scale organizations, especially dysfunctional ones like ICE. If more attorneys get put into high level positions within DHS then Michael Garcia (former AUSA) may not be held accountable for the meltdown that currently is taking place throughout ICE. What about looking for LEADERS instead of LITIGATORS to get DHS back on the right track? I'm sure the new and improved HR system that will be implemented later this year will entice successful managers from both within and outside government who are interested in taking on the challenges that DHS offers. After all, the whole idea of MaxHR is to hire the "best and brightest" for DHS. But then again, judging by the number of high-ranking officials to abandon DHS over the last couple of years, maybe not. Oh well. If Chertoff brings an army of attorneys with him at least they will be experienced enough to handle the onslaught of class action lawsuits that will undoubtedly be forthcoming in the next few years, once everyone realizes how the wonderful pay-for-performance system negatively affects them. GovExec.com reader Posted January 21, 2005 7:19 PM









