TOPICS

It would not have seemed possible given the vehement union opposition to last year's Defense Department personnel reform legislation, but on Wednesday Congress managed to pass another major personnel bill with lots of union support.

The bill, the NASA Workforce Flexibility Act, will allow NASA to boost its employee recruiting efforts by offering scholarships to students who agree to work for agency; paying relocation costs; and providing recruitment bonuses and more vacation time to incoming hires. Managers also would be able to offer higher starting salaries.

The Senate version of the bill, sponsored by Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, passed in November 2003. The House followed suit Wednesday, and President Bush is expected to sign the bill shortly.


RELATED STORIES

"Given what has happened over the past two years with regard to both the [Defense] and [Homeland Security Department] overhauls, it certainly is refreshing to see that the NASA human resources bill includes concrete protections for the agency's workers," said Greg Junemann, president of NASA's largest union, the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers.

Junemann credited House Science Committee Chairman Sherwood Boehlert, R-N.Y., with striking the right balance in the legislation. While including provisions in the bill that will enable the agency to entice promising young engineers and scientists to join it, Boehlert excluded other provisions that NASA management had requested and union advocates opposed, such as authority to implement unlimited demonstration projects and an employee exchange program with the private sector. The bill also requires the agency to distribute bonus money among all levels of the organization, a provision that Junemann touted as a victory for NASA workers.

Let A Thousand Job Sites Bloom

An amendment to the fiscal 2004 omnibus spending bill passed by Congress last week will allow federal agencies to maintain their own Web sites listing job openings and taking online applications.

The Office of Personnel Management had planned to consolidate all federal job listings on its new USAJobs site. But the OPM initiative met strong opposition from several human resources management firms that currently contract with federal agencies to maintain job sites. The group was led by Tacoma, Wash.-based Avue Technologies, and on Wednesday a company official said that Sens. Patty Murray, D-Wash.; Ted Stevens, R-Alaska; and Richard Shelby, R-Ala.; championed the amendment to bar OPM from implementing its plan.

Avue argued that individual agencies should maintain the option of keeping their own Web sites, which could then be tailored to attract the most appropriate applicants, to ask specific questions relevant to the job application, and to analyze the responses.

OPM officials, meanwhile, have touted the USAJobs site as a way of streamlining the federal job application process, making it easier to find federal jobs. According to OPM, more than 31 million visitors have visited the site since its August 2003 launch.

COMMENTS

  • In the sub-article titled "Let A Thousand Job Sites Bloom", I was very pleased to learn that Congress has decided to let individual agencies retain their own job sites for recruiting purposes. OPM's plan to consolidate all federal sites into one was poorly conceived, not vetted with agency experts to any significant degree, and executed by OPM bureaucrats and private sector "experts" with no real knowledge of the federal recruiting scene or the advances in electronic recruiting capabilities developed and fielded by federal agencies. The driving force behind this OPM initiative was no more than an attempt to enhance its image by joining in with the Bush administration initiative to set up e-government initiatives, whether logical or not, and whether needed or not. In keeping with this pithy motivation, OPM followed the current mantras which say that consolidation and standardization are the ultimate tools of effective organizations, and that the private sector always knows best how to get things done. In this case, OPM was wrong on both counts. Monster.Com pieced togather a very poorly constructed consolidated job site with little functionality and no insight into the current state of federal electronic recruitng tools. The other real problem is that federal HR organizations were unwilling and unable to stop OPM's boneheaded idea on their own. No one is willing to speak out against ill thought out program proposals or to take any risks in the name of progress. It is a sad commentary when we have to depend on Congress to do the right thing. As a recently retired federal HR director, I urge my former colleagues to voice their opinions and ideas when they beleive that higher level management has blundered. We owe it to our real clients: the taxpayers.