TOPICS

Homeland Security Department officials said Monday that the government does not plan to place many security requirements on private industry when it comes to protecting the nation's critical infrastructure.

James Loy, the department's deputy secretary, said the federal government will back away from issuing new security mandates to industry, and instead let private companies take the lead "in most cases" to protect critical infrastructure, such as power plants and water reservoirs.

"We cannot secure the homeland from Washington, D.C.," Loy told a gathering of industry representatives during a conference sponsored by the department's information analysis and infrastructure protection directorate. Loy said up to 85 percent of the nation's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by private firms.


RELATED STORIES

"You are in the best position to tell us where your vulnerabilities lie, what the business community is doing, what first responders need and how we can help in that process," he said. "But unlike wars of the past ... this is not going to be a situation where the federal government simply does it for the nation."

Loy said the directorate's mission is to analyze potential threats against the United States, map the nation's critical infrastructure, identify ways to reduce vulnerabilities and provide industry with information.

During a panel discussion before Loy spoke, Frank Libutti, DHS undersecretary for information analysis and infrastructure protection, said the department wants to partner with, rather than regulate, industry. He said private companies, however, might have to invest in better security measures.

"When necessary, they need to belly up and put money on the table to support refining their readiness to deal with the security dimensions of the 21st century," Libutti said. "We need to partner like we never have before and that starts with coming to the table and talking straight from the shoulder about their needs, our needs, setting standards and moving out together."

Loy said the department does not yet have a breakdown of how homeland security expenses will be shouldered by state and local governments, the private sector and the federal government. He said the department will work with different sectors in the coming months to determine how costs will be allocated.

Homeland Security also will alter its national threat advisory system, Loy said. In the future, it will issue recommended steps of action that different sectors should take when threat levels are increased. Loy emphasized that the actions will not be mandatory. He also echoed comments made by DHS Secretary Tom Ridge last week that future threat levels may be targeted to certain industries or regions as opposed to the entire country.

Loy said the department is still developing its processes and practices.

"I will be the first to acknowledge that the vision that we have for DHS is a work in progress," he said. "And I would be the first to acknowledge that ... the notion of what critical infrastructure protection and information analysis and sharing means to this country has yet to play itself out and be realized from coast to coast."

COMMENTS

  • The number of water utilities in the hands of publicly traded companies in the US has grown at an alarming rate. These companies operate in part for purpose of generating a profit for their shareholders.The public they serve are only protected by US Government Regulations. I fully agree with Carlos's position. We would still be polluting our air and water if the government had not created the Clean Air Act or the Clean Water Act.
  • Sorry Carlos but in my experience very few water utilities are private. We don't need a regulation to support your sales. If the managers of the water utilities do not evaluate your technology as worthwhile then you need to improve it or educate them to your point of view. Don't run to the government for another regulation - learn how to compete in a free market!
  • Without regulatory requirements private industry will not make any major investments into security measures. Case in point is our technology for rapid detection of water contamination called the IQ-Tox test. After being verified by EPA/ETV and proven to be the best technology available in the marketplace (8 technologies from around the world)the market response has been lukewarm. Most water utilities believe EPA needs to provide a directive for action before they make any major move.