Pentagon’s Internal Feud Over Contract Auditing Takes a New Twist

Flickr user mrsbluff

The ongoing dispute over the quality of work at the Defense Contract Audit Agency took a new turn on Thursday with the release of a Defense Inspector General’s Office report criticizing the professional judgment used in DCAA assignments dating back to 2010 and earlier.

The March 7 report -- which the deputy IG acknowledged was delayed for two years while the office’s staff focused more on DCAA hotlines than audits -- covered quality assurance reviews on 50 DCAA reports completed in the first half of fiscal 2010.

“DCAA did not exercise professional judgment in performing 37 (74 percent) of the assignments reviewed,” the IG team concluded. “The abundance of non-compliances with standards identified in the 37 assignments evidenced the need for improvements in the area of competence at DCAA.”

Significant quality issues raised included “external impairments to independence, inadequate planning, poor communications with the requester and contractor, insufficient evidence, unsupported or untimely reports, poor documentation, and ineffective supervision and quality control,” the report said. It recommended that some of the reports be withdrawn or revised, adding that DCAA managers agreed in principle.

“Since August 26, 2009, DCAA has not had an opinion on its quality control system covering DCAA audits and attestation engagements” nor has it submitted to an external peer review at least every three years, as required by Generally Accepted Government Audit Standards, the IG said.

“Since fiscal 2009, DCAA has taken various corrective actions such as revising training class curriculums, requiring additional training for all audit staff, and revamping audit programs and guidance,” the IG said. “We will evaluate the effectiveness of these actions during future reviews.”

Pentagon executives, in statements emailed to Government Executive, complained that the IG report focuses on old work and fails to factor in reforms instituted at DCAA by Patrick Fitzgerald after he took over as director in November 2009.

"I'm troubled that the focus of this is on work that was performed between 2006 and 2009, which completely ignores the changes our employees have made in the last three years,” Fitzgerald said. “Not only does the report fail to reflect current operations, it's an unfair characterization of the significant improvements our workforce has made in audit quality. While the issues raised in the report are important, the time period of analysis doesn't begin to account for the progress we've made."

Fitzgerald’s boss, Pentagon Comptroller Robert Hale, said, "I am deeply disappointed that this report is being issued when it so clearly reflects old data and replicates findings previously made” by the Government Accountability Office in 2009. “I question the usefulness of a report that is being issued four years after the DCAA work was performed. I remain committed to ensuring that DCAA execute its mission effectively, and I welcome fair analyses that focus on DCAA's current work."

(Image via Flickr user mrsbluff)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

    Download
  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.